JediMaster

LOL, as some of you may know, I personally have 1/4 that number of posts on another sim board.

The thing is unless you want to power project and have your ships sailing around the world for months on end, nuclear power isn't necessary. Diesel/electric subs are far quieter and have plenty of range when you're interested in coastal waters. Nuke subs have the disadvantage there because of plant noise. Only recently has the US made its nuke subs quiet enough to compete with those. What good is a 1st gen nuke sub going to be when everyone can hear it?

I'm just going to get Ep 2, but I'm waiting for the price to drop below $30. I loved the commentary in Lost Coast and Ep 1, very good info there. For DVD buffs like me that listen to all the commentaries it's great. I do admit I've only listened to 2 of the 4 on the LOTR extended editions, though!

Hey, I just spent almost $250 getting the complete SG-1 series on DVD!

Splash the Zeros! I repeat, splash the Zeros!

I don't recall ever hearing about any countermeasures on any Fishbed variants myself. I do know that some Floggers had launchers scabbed onto the rear fuselage, though, especially ones that were in Afghanistan.

He was using the Force!

Sounds like you made an error in the WE and the game doesn't like it. You can always delete the weapon.dat and .ini and it should start again.

Take the tail end of that out, and you sound ridiculous! "Hey, I dropped this brick on my foot, a little help?" "Oh ye!"

Never heard of it.

That's a real problem. Planes will often fly in very close formation to appear as fewer targets on radar. If they're WVR, you can use things like the autolock or HMD to lock onto whoever you want, but BVR your options are indeed constrained.

Right here: http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autom...mp;showfile=343

There were changes to the FM settings in the expansion, so addon planes/FMs done for the previous release may not behave well at all. YMMV.

Just as the F-14's name of "Turkey" meant anything but.

I love the Stargate universe, and was very sad when the FPS was cancelled. That said, I'm not sure how an MMO would work there and frankly I don't care for MMOs period.

That's because you've got such AWESOME weather.

That's the F-108's name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XF-108_Rapier

Oh, the 2nd gen Flankers? No ETA on those other than, naturally, 2 weeks.

C-5s are scary on takeoff. Those engines whine and growl so much it sounds like it's STRAINING to get airborne. You almost think the engines are going to go POOF at any second.

Right, how long it takes to do it well isn't the problem. Just give us updates to let us know you've not abandoned us in the dark, lonely night...

Now, there are some women I'd pay that for.

I can't tell if you frakking blipping or blipping frakking!

No, that was Carl. He's new.

That's tomorrow! :fan_1:

Many of the planes, especially the new ones, have massive nose up tendencies that you have to fight. For the Camel 130, I watched the plane in exterior view and it's the elevator that's the problem. In the 110 or 150, you pull back or push forward on the stick and release and the elevator returns to neutral (0 degrees deflection). On the 130, If you pull back and release, it returns to what seems to be 5 or so degrees up. If you push forward and release, it returns to about 5 degrees down. It won't return to 0 degrees. That trim statement may fix it, but I don't know if that's a line missing from it that the 110 and 150 have or if it's merely a band-aid to fix the real problem somewhere else.