Crusader

Great steelbox!

Excellente.. time to fry some TAQ in the 'Stan ...

Easy .... NL on the fin and orange stripes .... hey.. thats the new Dutch demo bird! ..

"Official" doesnt mean that they got it right. But in this case, since the loadout was used several times, seems like some squadrons or the Wing got the spacers for the rails... and the right leaders who were ready to go new ways.

Improvise, adapt, overcome .... eh :D guess they mounted extra LAU-7 on station 2 and 8 .. on the underside.. making a triple AIM-9 pack on each side.. very cool looks ;) edit : spal1!ng

Super rare loadout ... if it was real... but I think its not. I've seen lots of nonsense in official papers, wrong abbreviations, etc etc. Btw, White/Bettine killed their MiG on 19 August '72 , on a Chaff Escort mission .. armed with 4 winders, 2 AIM-7, 2 ECM pods and 3 tanks But right.. never say "never" .. ;)

USAF never loaded TERs etc and Sidewinder at the same time on the inboard stations - we had a thread on that on the old C5 forum and were not able to find a single picture with such a configuration ( of an operational aircraft - static displays etc doesnt count ) USAF didnt have the spacers for the AIM-9 rails ( they got them, if at all, only sometime in the late 70's or 80's ) USN/USMC Phantoms were different, they used other inboard pylons ( only USAF F-4C had the same but without the spacers ) and adapters .. all kinds of combinations of TER w Bombs, Rocket pods and Sidewinders were used operational. USN/USMC Phantom were wired for a gunpod on the centerline only - one USMC squadron (I think it was VMFA-122 ) changed that and rewired their aircraft for gunpods on the outboard stations too.. but that was a "special" The IDF didnt have spacers early on too, but they came up with a work around - they loaded only 2 bombs in a slant layout on the TER ( botttom and one side station ) which gave space for one Sidewinder Later they added spacers, then special wide spacers for Python 3, and a special pylon for AIM-9/Python 3 in the forward right sparrow well.

Sierra Hotel!

better cockpit http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=3235

better cockpit http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?autoc...p;showfile=3235

LOL .. 12 points for MEXICO!!1

looki good!

looks like a stationgroup # issue .. and/or attachment class you should have 3 station groups outboard pylons = group 1 inboard pylons = group 2 centerline = group 3 your screenie shows 4 ..

level release or a glide release ( shallow dive, ~ -10 deg ) should work OK, altitude 8k to 13k ft, distance 3-5 nm, speed ~ 450 KIAS

Russ, you can use the LaunchRail function... , e.g.: ModelNodeName=PylonL <-------- pylon mesh name PylonMass=60 PylonDragArea=0.02 LaunchRailNodeName=PylonL_IRM <-------- name of the rail mesh LaunchRailHeight=0.10 <-------------- height of the rail in cm, then the game puts the missile at the right place LaunchRailMass=25 edit: just for fun ... and spall!ng...

good skin

great

Guess your throttle has a switch position that reads "Knive" ...

+1

Nee, um die Symbole dem HUD anzupassen müssen alle Positionen geändert werden ....

I made updated avionics with new HUD for the TMF Vipers, already included in the DS mod ... havent found the time to make a upgrade package for the complete TMF Viper series but I can make a Paki block 15 service pack... ~

Das ganze HUD von der A-7E ? In der A-6A.ini , ändere den Eintrag für die AvionicsData ini ... AvionicsDLL=Avionics60.dll ( keine änderung hier, SF2 hat erweiterte avionics60 dll ) AvionicsDataFilename=A-7E_avionics.ini <---- Das ganze A-7E HUD ist aber wahrscheinlich viel zu groß für das A-6A Visier.... So weit mal für'n Anfang...

cool...

Great!

cool.. parking with the big boys...