Jump to content

Gocad

+MODDER
  • Posts

    2,193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Gocad

  1. I don't think that the Ark Royal is the problem. I once had played around with a campaign using the GermanyCE terrain and had no problems to put in the Ark and fly off it. What bcyc described sounds in fact like what happens when you made a mistake with the carrier number (i.e. they don't match). Perhaps that could be it.
  2. It would be easier to see what is wrong if one could take a look at your modified campaign_data file. Btw, you did add a carrier station to the GermanyCE_targets file, right?
  3. Actually this is not true. I have seen my AI wingmen crashing with their Bf109G-10 because their fuel had run out. The propeller had stopped and they descended towards the ground. Needless to say they didn't bother to bail out....Idiots.
  4. I'm sure the people at Boeing would have been happy to develop the X-32 into a combat aircraft for Australia...but something tells me that would have been quite expensive.
  5. There are three steps necessary to get the MOABstation to work: 1. Copy & Paste the [MOABstation] part into the C-130J_Data file. Btw, change its StationID from 1 to 5. 2. Change the NationName entry to 'USAF' 3. Add 'SystemName[016]=MOABStation' to the [Fuselage] section. And after 2003 you should be able to drop the MOAB from C-130.
  6. Btw, is anybody working on the Meteor missile?
  7. The F4U and the A-7 were built by the same company...
  8. I know there was a fly-off between the F-14 and F-15 in the late 1970s when the Shah was shopping for a new interceptor. A documentary about the Tomcat claimed that the Shah had preferred the Eagle first, but I guess you now which aircraft ended up in Iranian hands...
  9. They do work fine as long as you follow FastCargo's installation instructions.
  10. I'm not sure, but somehow I doubt that an Apache or Cobra could keep up with an Osprey.
  11. Yeah, that did it. Needless to say that my wingman dropped the MOAB way off the target, but I'd say that's a general AI problem that they don't know how use LGBs/EOGBs properly.
  12. Me like Big Boom! But the stupid AI pilots refuse to use them...
  13. ASRAAMs are already in the weapons pack. Nice skin, though. Seriously, this looks very promising.
  14. Hmm, Looks like CNN has developed an interest in the Osprey: New article: Giving the Osprey more firepower.
  15. Well, the AI reaction to most threats is far from being perfect, but they do react to incoming SAMs by dropping Chaff (when available). Therefore, you can't say they do not react at all.
  16. Iron Eagle. And Iron Eagle, part II. Israel was a popular country for making films in the 1980s.
  17. There is no GBU-10C in the weapons pack. Use the GBU-10B instead.
  18. Hmmm, I'm going to be a bit more realistic and state I'm rather looking forward to the Hornet D-model than the Superbug. Well, it's worth a try.
  19. Well, I had the same question some time ago. Sure, this was about adding a dual AHM rack to the Hornet, but the principle should be the same.
  20. Just follow this link Also, check the Knowledge Base.
  21. If it were, then how come it's going to be exported while the F-22 is not?
  22. I doubt that a Tomcat could outrun a Flanker....
  23. Nobody mention the fly-off between the F-14 and F-15 in the late 1970s when the Shah was looking for a new interceptor... This commercial break would carry a lot more weight if the Tomcat had been involved similar engagements as the F-15. Seriously, comparisons between the Tomcat and the Super Hornet lead nowhere. It's like comparing the F-15C with the F-16E/F. And who would do that? Not me.
  24. Yes, it is. Also, what is really new about this F-14 anyway?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..