Jump to content

Stary

MODDER
  • Posts

    8,500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    100

Everything posted by Stary

  1. Hey! I wasn;t looking at the tail! Decals were more important to me! Hey! I wasn;t looking at the tail! Decals were more important to me!
  2. Jeff is BACK!!! Good points there my friend, I don't do full ramp start in A-10C, well I did with voice instructor -once. Then I sweared to myself never to do it again. APU on, wait 3 minutes till it's operational. Good, now switch this and that. Cool. Now we can switch on this and that kind of stuff IIRC And we're not your 45 old guy in mom's basement after all -but I love the sense of speed DCS gives down low as I'm a born mud mover khe khe khe
  3. IDK if I'd buy FC3, the promise of having it merged sounds tempting though
  4. Stary

    Typhoid!

    Happy Birthday Typhoid! Cheers! :drinks:
  5. FC2 and LOMAC to run FC3? Quite odd... I do realize they don't have rights to certain assets but it's kinda f-up edit: not that I don't have LOMAC and FC2 (I do) but it's strange -that would be module after all
  6. Modder's Golden Rule 11: why modders switch between the mods they're working on? NOT to get insane. Why it takes soo long to finish a mod? Because of switching to other.

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. Teras

      Teras

      i see what you did there ;|

    3. daddyairplanes

      daddyairplanes

      two words... oooh shiny...

    4. Spillone104

      Spillone104

      True story ;)

  7. will see, I come from the "the more various moddable titles the better"* part of the world, peace *as long as these are TW titles with DCS level of graphics, I haven't specified my planet I came from
  8. Also please note that it is confirmed not all DCS modules will be of A-10C fidelity -which is excellent news for me because making such detailed addon takes like forever (ask FSX Hornet guys, what it is now, 6 years?) and I don't need that level of complexity for say 3rd party DCS Fagot, Sturmovik, Skyraider, Panther... damn I start to see a pattern here
  9. can be dumbed down (haven't tried) but yeah I concur, something in the line of FC2 (also 3?) and I'm sold Brain, I don't take your posts as jabbing at DCS, I just think we're too evolved as hardware/software goes not to use the technology... in a nice optimized way Only thing about DCS is the amount of time needed to generate 3rd party terrain -from what I understand very similar to TW's "Stutterland engine" (copyright by Stary!)
  10. that would be me :yes: but 1) I want the man to see he's not the only one for his loyal customers 2) giving a s**t about some obvious flaws pointed out for years is getting kinda rude (sic!) 3) he could have alot more customers, even years-long afficionados IF he made few decisions (or didn't made some)
  11. 5000$ PC? Looks similarily to current DCS fidelity level -also I think he'll bake the details into lower poly models from these The "I won't see those blowing by 900 km/f" thingy -if so we'd be still having Falcon 3.0/Mig-29/Hornet 3.0 era objects in every sim, right? I DO like to use other views apart from cockpit one too and when what I see is more and more complex each new title/hardware era the more I feel I'm in the game so to speak. By the way those are excellent models in themselves, imagine them running in complex environment
  12. it's the insane amount of detail that wins for me compared to good old ladies
  13. http://forum.avsim.net/topic/378083-beczl-mods/ From Beczl... I'm more and more thinking about moving from Thirdwire on to DCS World guys, as sorry as it sounds
  14. nowthat's something
  15. link?
  16. there's even new Wikileaks photo of Mr. Obama watching with his "gameplay advisors" alpha-build of new Thirdwire title for mobile market : Draw your own conclusions... Sorry, couldn't resist
  17. good point random thought No.5643 why TK never ever implemented views of fired weapons for all sides, together missile-to-player // missile-to-others ones?
  18. looks interesting that's for sure... and yes I love depressing grim games. Max Payne, OFP:Resistance
  19. I can't recall us discussing missiles behaviour (not to be mistaken with AI handling of BVR for example) in ages...
  20. Veltro's back in business.. I say "welcome back" Funny as I was dritfing around wikipedia few days ago and found XF-108 I never had knowledge of... (yes... that's true ) and now you're showing wips of it -nice coincidence (or conspiracy! ) BTW I very much like the similarities to A-5 in it's fuselage shape (to my untrained eye)
  21. Stary

    Vipers

    Dunno about Polish variant, never came across one you might ask Czarny900 about doing it (Bartek jesteś tam?)
  22. ini files can allways be tweked (until it's locked...)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..