Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I know I asked it before, but now, since the Talon from "Stealth" was modeled for WOE, is there a slight possibility, that also the superb but fictional MiG-31 Firefox from the same movie will make it to WOE?

 

Would like to have dogfights in her very bad. She was already made flyable for FS2002/04 but with no weapon support. :good:

Edited by NazGhul
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I know I asked it before, but now, since the Talon from "Stealth" was modeled for WOE, is there a slight possibility, that also the superb but fictional MiG-31 Firefox from the same movie will make it to WOE?

 

Would like to have dogfights in her very bad. She was already made flyable for FS2002/04 but with no weapon support. :good:

 

It's a WIP at the moment as far as I know.

Posted

Hmmmmmmmmm. I'm confused as to why this thing is called the MIG-31 and isnt a name that isnt takin. Because the designation of MIG-31 is already taken by the Foxhound.

Posted

Don't forget when the movie was made, the TRUE MiG-31 probably wasn't in production yet.

 

I, personally think we should rename it "MiG-32 Flatulator" :crazy:

 

But that's just me.......

 

Wrench

Kevin Stein

Posted

Craig Thomas wrote "Firefox" in 1977, and followed it up with "Firefox Down", in 1984.

 

When the book was published, the MiG-27 was the newest Mikoyan production aircraft known to the west, though the existence of a newer model (the '29) had been speculated since 1976. That's why he choose to make his fictional aircraft the MiG-31. By 1984, the existence of the '31 had been verified, but Thomas wisely chose to continue using the '31 model number for his fictional aircraft, for continuity's sake.

 

The movie based on the fist novel came out in 1982.

Posted

I guess we need to start lobbying TK for a new patch!!

 

BTW Capun, any chance of a new pilot to go with this one? A black version of the PVO pilot would be good.

Posted
A black version of the PVO pilot would be good.

 

{cough} Talon pilot {cough}

 

I'll redo it with a closed faceplate

 

Wrench

KevinStein

Posted (edited)

FINALLY!...

 

Something with enough meat to give the Talon a run for its money... (Though the latest SU-27 does a pretty good job) :biggrin:

Edited by Zurawski
Posted

Now I'll have the themesong from the movie stuck in my head for the rest of the night...so I'll have to throw the DVD on or something. :biggrin: What's really kooky is I just started re-reading (for about the 5th time) the Firefox books too.

Posted

Of course the real 31 was just a redone 25, but I remember some early DoD "impressions" of the MiG-29 looked like a cross between the real 29 and 31. That plane of course never was made.

The real 29 surprised a lot of people, as did the Su-27.

 

I was impressed with one aspect of the Firefox design, though, and that was that they kept MiG's signature tailfin design. Put it in a sideview comparison with a real Flogger, Foxbat, Foxhound, or Fulcrum and it's the same tailfin.

Posted

Well there was also the "Mig-37 Ferret" that was done AFAIK as a Testors model that I had bought and lost so long ago.

Posted

I came across that design just recently looking for data on the MFI( and found some contenders from other design bureaus)

 

I actually thought it was a concept made by MiG, not the DoD.

post-7445-1176838764_thumb.jpg

Posted
Well there was also the "Mig-37 Ferret" that was done AFAIK as a Testors model that I had bought and lost so long ago.

 

I had that one as well. Gee, I can't believe it was nearly 20 years ago... :blink:

 

Ferret.jpg

Posted

Well I wonder how it must feel to fly her, since it never existed AND it has never been seen in action, neither reality nor movie

Posted
I had that one as well. Gee, I can't believe it was nearly 20 years ago... :blink:

 

Ferret.jpg

 

Well since you bring that up, it has been a minute since I owned it too...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..