Teras Posted July 2, 2011 Author Posted July 2, 2011 i have just finished the new navigation pod that will come up with our f-16s and also will be used by ace's f-16s Update on electronic systems : AN/AAQ-13 Navigation Pod in game screens will come up soon! Cheers 3 Quote
+ST0RM Posted July 3, 2011 Posted July 3, 2011 Honestly, I would not waste much effort on the AAQ-13/14 LANTIRN pods. The Block 50s never used them. Blk 40/42 did, but with advent of LITENING & SNIPER, they went away. I last saw LANTIRN being used by the Egyptian AF on their Blk 40s in 2009. Your model is looking good. I'm curious as to what the Blk70 is? Quote
Svetlin Posted July 3, 2011 Posted July 3, 2011 I think the F-16 configuration proposed to India is refered to as Block 70 or F-16IN. Quote
Teras Posted July 3, 2011 Author Posted July 3, 2011 Honestly, I would not waste much effort on the AAQ-13/14 LANTIRN pods. The Block 50s never used them. Blk 40/42 did, but with advent of LITENING & SNIPER, they went away. I last saw LANTIRN being used by the Egyptian AF on their Blk 40s in 2009. Your model is looking good. I'm curious as to what the Blk70 is? well thats not targeting pods , its a navigation pod and it is used by many countries such as usa and israel and its important for night operations our f-16s will come up with many various ( f-16 b50/52 & b60 & b70 ) the b70 is the indian one which is offered by usa for india with high performance but india picked other fighter , we have here many f16 fans the block 70 will be more than likely fictional plus the f-16fin for some reason with its performance considered as block 60+ IMHO so the block 70 will come up as the best f-16 ever released here at CA with its armaments block 70 single & tow seater armaments list : electronic systems / - AN/APG-79 active electronically scanned array ( AESA ) you know this piece of art -AN/AVQ-14V sniper pod XR Enhanced -AN/AAQ-13 lantirn navigation pod -foe or friend system weapons / - new jdams model including jdam er -aim-120c amram new model -aim-9x new model -gbu-24 new model -gbu-12D & B new models -jsow all types new models -gbu-15er -agm-84h/ER -storm shadow cruise missile other / - wing and fuselage external fuel tanks + conformal fuel tanks ( over fuselage ) - all new racks - all new multiple and triple and single ejector racks - multiple ejector racks for jsow - all new cockpit with 4 MFDs thats all about the block 70s and other thing i will mention in the release day! Cheers Quote
+Soulfreak Posted July 4, 2011 Posted July 4, 2011 Sounds very interesting Teras! Any chance for a "D" version too? Quote
+ace888 Posted July 4, 2011 Posted July 4, 2011 Buddy, Looking good on the pods... You plan to put CFT on the birds? I had asked Alejandro to do a special mod for me to make an Advance Falcon F-16. So far I do not know the progress, did not get any updates from him? My idea was to combine the IFF blades on the nose, RWR fairings from the side front nose and the side intakes of the F-16I Sufa. The Nose cone of the F-16E, The front base fairing on the vertical tail of the F-16E. The aft base fairing of the drag chute section with the ECM blisters of the late Block 52+. The experimental intake system base on the F-35 (DSI or DVI intakes). The LOAN exhaust nozzle by P&W, and the CFT for the late F-16 version... I hope you are making sure the aft base fairing for the vertical tail is model correctly (especially the one with the drag chute varient). This is critical to make it a good looking F-16. Cheers Quote
+Soulfreak Posted July 4, 2011 Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) Buddy, Looking good on the pods... You plan to put CFT on the birds? I had asked Alejandro to do a special mod for me to make an Advance Falcon F-16. So far I do not know the progress, did not get any updates from him? My idea was to combine the IFF blades on the nose, RWR fairings from the side front nose and the side intakes of the F-16I Sufa. The Nose cone of the F-16E, The front base fairing on the vertical tail of the F-16E. The aft base fairing of the drag chute section with the ECM blisters of the late Block 52+. The experimental intake system base on the F-35 (DSI or DVI intakes). The LOAN exhaust nozzle by P&W, and the CFT for the late F-16 version... I hope you are making sure the aft base fairing for the vertical tail is model correctly (especially the one with the drag chute varient). This is critical to make it a good looking F-16. Cheers other / - wing and fuselage external fuel tanks + conformal fuel tanks ( over fuselage ) - all new racks - all new multiple and triple and single ejector racks - multiple ejector racks for jsow - all new cockpit with 4 MFDs For me it sounds so. But it would be nice to implement the Tanks into the Aircraft 3D model. so they could be easy skinned. Edited July 4, 2011 by Soulfreak Quote
Teras Posted July 4, 2011 Author Posted July 4, 2011 Buddy, Looking good on the pods... You plan to put CFT on the birds? I had asked Alejandro to do a special mod for me to make an Advance Falcon F-16. So far I do not know the progress, did not get any updates from him? My idea was to combine the IFF blades on the nose, RWR fairings from the side front nose and the side intakes of the F-16I Sufa. The Nose cone of the F-16E, The front base fairing on the vertical tail of the F-16E. The aft base fairing of the drag chute section with the ECM blisters of the late Block 52+. The experimental intake system base on the F-35 (DSI or DVI intakes). The LOAN exhaust nozzle by P&W, and the CFT for the late F-16 version... I hope you are making sure the aft base fairing for the vertical tail is model correctly (especially the one with the drag chute varient). This is critical to make it a good looking F-16. Cheers thanks for tips but my recent post's screens was for BLOCK 70! it means that model was F-16C Block 70 and its already Advanced Falcon so don't worry me and cadeteBRA taking care for each part and detail in each block and variant! Quote
PeacePuma Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) Guys, I have 2 requests I would ask you to consider the block 50/52 + (Pratt & Whitney engine), with its unique air intake ... and besides I ask that this model is compatible with Series 1 to test it online sessions PS You think also create a block D?? Congratulations for this work, have my help to create skins for different operators. Thanks for your time. regards Edited July 6, 2011 by PeacePuma Quote
+Soulfreak Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 PS You think also create a block D?? Question awnsered before! thanks , yes there will be D one Quote
+Heberth Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 certainly we'll create a f-16 for SF1, as is still the only one with multiplayer support. and thanks for your help! ps: what is the biggest difference in that air intake? Quote
Teras Posted July 6, 2011 Author Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) I would ask you to consider the block 50/52 + (Pratt & Whitney engine), with its unique air intake PS You think also create a block D?? Congratulations for this work, have my help to create skins for different operators. Thanks for your time. regards our f-16s all with pratt & whitney engines with its air intake ( all f-16 from b50/52 to b60 uses P&W engines with its air intake ) and yes me and cadeteBRA working on the D block we welcome your help and appreciate it SF1 version will be included thanks Edited July 6, 2011 by Teras Quote
jack33 Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 thank,s,strike fighter will make your project better than Falcon 4 Quote
+MigBuster Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) our f-16s all with pratt & whitney engines with its air intake ( all f-16 from b50/52 to b60 uses P&W engines with its air intake ) No the Block 30/40/50/60 use the General Electric (GE) engines and have the larger air intake (aka the Big mouth) The Block 25/32/42/52 use the Pratt & Whitney (P&W) engines and have the smaller air intake. I believe that some early GE Block 30s had a smaller air intake - not sure how many this affected. Quite happy to provide examples of how you can tell from looking which engine is installed. Edited July 6, 2011 by MigBuster Quote
+MigBuster Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 thank,s,strike fighter will make your project better than Falcon 4 Only in terms of Graphics unfortunately...... Quote
Murphy'S Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 Only in terms of Graphics unfortunately...... yes until TK implement MFD to correctly render theses kind of pits a matter of time i guess Quote
jack33 Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 Only in terms of Graphics unfortunately...... Falcon4 has many bug and CTD Quote
xclusiv8 Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 I dont belive TK will ever implement anything that will look even close to what Falcon4 is. He is not trying to make it more realistic. He is happy with what he has. Quote
+MigBuster Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 Falcon4 has many bug and CTD Not on my system Quote
+MigBuster Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 I dont belive TK will ever implement anything that will look even close to what Falcon4 is. He is not trying to make it more realistic. He is happy with what he has. Yes should not be comparing really - F-4 is an extremely in depth detailed Flight simulator with a superb dynamic campaign, avionics, A-A refulling etc - where as TK has said it many times he will stick to the simplistic side of things - the very reason why I can use both. Quote
+Coupi Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) Hello, To my mind Strike Fighter 2 is a very very good military aviation PC game! SF2 is a sort of kingdom for modders like Tejas/cadeteBRA with their beautiful F-16C/D 50/70 project. Falcon 4 is for me too complex, this is a very accurate flight simulator, this is another way of playing. Coupi. Edited July 6, 2011 by Coupi Quote
jack33 Posted July 6, 2011 Posted July 6, 2011 (edited) Not on my system I play falcon since 1998,Erazor, SP3, SP4, BMS, Freefalcon, Openfalcon,and no version is completely stable, with the exception Allied Force.of course is the best simulator on the market but the addiction model of our friend TERAS is an Awesome notice Best regards Edited July 6, 2011 by jack33 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.