MigBuster

All of those are effective - I wouldnt bother with Napalm though. The targets actually need a direct hit to destroy them - there is no intermediary effects of the truck catching fire or the crew suffering from other effects a bomb brings I'm afraid. For moving targets cannon and rockets are the best - also use cluster bombs on formations of tanks. For a line of trucks ripple rockets along them - or drop CBUs - works every time. From the mid 70s you can use Mavericks.

I'm still not convinced they actually need make such cuts in such a short space of time - anyway its a good job the RAF can cover every hot spot around the globe.............oh Typical private company way of doing things - maybe they will outsource everything to the USN.

Kinda - on the good side they will now jettison their stores and deploy counter measures and employ defensive techniques. On the not so good side they will sometimes try to destroy every SAM and AAA site in the area and ignore you.

What patch are you running? What system? Are you using an Ati card? - if so set it to let the application decide on Anti Aliasing and Anistropic Filtering levels

Excellent news - was wondering if this would ever make it!

Looks like TK has just put in an A-4N_Ahit type - he does this with a lot of campaigns you will notice. He puts the correct jet the squadron used - then an alternate if it cant be included with the stock game. An example from my SF2I campaign3_data.ini [AirUnit003] AircraftType=A-4N_Ahit_78 AlternateType=A-4H_Ahit_73 Squadron=102IDF ForceID=1 Nation=ISRAEL DefaultTexture=IDFCamo1 BaseArea=Ramon Airbase BaseMoveChance=0 ..............

If you have put it in the correct place....what are your system specs? - 1024x1024 tiles are pretty hefty.

Good new thanks

Try putting your Anti Virus and/or firewall into game mode - or even temporarily disable them to see if the same thing happens. Also try a basic desktop instead to 3D aero. What you describe doesnt sound like a CTD - its as though another program is demanding the Desktop and gets control of everything.

Karlo Kopp puts the same total **** on every bit of paper he writes - he seems to base this on an understanding of Air combat in about 1973. From reading other forums it was thought he always wrote such speculative pants because he didnt want the Aussies to get it and he may have been part of a group that may have made money from upgrading the F-111s instead - yes you can check it out the "super pig" at his site. Papers with no backup and hilarious comparisons to justify his claims (compares the F-35 with the F-105 in one!) As far as platforms go you could deduce from whats out there that the Su-35 has a kinematic advantage and is probably more agile at most speeds (especially low speed). In regards to Stealth, Avionics, Support, Situation Awareness and weapons the Su-35 wont be in the same league.

What that says to me is "look at us setting a moral example - why cant the rest of the world be as perfect as us" Tell me - how many colonies did we let you have back after 1945 when we created your country again? - and how many of those were you kicked out of That rather ignorant and misguided comment does not cause justification for abandoning overseas territories when the people want us there.

Any chance of a screenshot?

Thats good to hear - need a challenge - besides I cant imagine its ever been easy being an A-10 since it came in.

There is a Falcon 4 AF download section - you will need to put them there.