Jump to content

MigBuster

+ADMINISTRATOR
  • Posts

    9,137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by MigBuster

  1. Im wondering whether the max visible distance value had to be increased for that?
  2. Left at AMARC till 1986 before a refurb to US Navy Standard apparently - thats a long time to leave it sitting there :( Amazing to think that the F-14A could have racked up 159 confirmed Air to Air kills with Iran - now thats a Turkey shoot!
  3. Now now be nice - There was plenty of Georgian Artillery and armour on the BBC rolling out of SO - and they only reported military targets being hit - apart from a stray bomb - but that happens in every air campaign tbh.
  4. MigBuster

    Thank You MK2

    SPAM!
  5. Yes - it is actually designed for the Original Falcon 4 and works best over that.
  6. MigBuster

    Caption This

    Is this the last person that asked TK to include brake chutes in the next patch?
  7. thought so - I know some of the later SA-2s used by the VPAF were HOJ - but the pods got round that by jamming the guidance commands so the things just crashed back to earth - not easy to model something so complicated really - just keep the HOJ box unticked
  8. Is that the stock WOE A-10A? thought it had a built in one - dont think ive ever had to add a designating pod to drop Paveways - though will need to check this later. As for the stock WOE AVQ-23 in the weps editor does it have its weapon type as Noise Jammer and not laser designator (or whatever)?
  9. Do you know if any US forces are currently helping secure the Nukes?
  10. Yeah im stuck with 1280x1024 for the mo so cant see too far either - the track IR4 thing is good for zooming in to see afar if you must
  11. Are you using the weps editor that came with the weapons pack? - or are you using the one that works with WOI - that you can get from here or 3rdWires site? - should be dated 2008
  12. Was thinking more of this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk2sPl_Z7ZU...feature=related But saying that - unless you are that good an artist use PS/GIMP - much easier anyway :)
  13. Have any of the pods got towed Decoys? Do the SAMs home in regardless of the jamming type? - 'Deception' jamming shouldnt present a target to a HOJ missile apparently.
  14. SA-3s were there in late 1972 according to Istvan Toperczer apparently one of the few foreign nationals that has been allowed access to the VPAF war files - even supplies photos of them with Vietnamese dressed soldiers by them.
  15. Most LCD TFT screens normally have a 'native' resolution setting - basically their optimum setting - and if you set it to other resolutions its likely you will get a worse display from what ive seen
  16. whatever so do you get no symbols on the rwr or no sound??? Was the RWR okay before you put in the avionics mod? what game are you running this in? can you give us a link to the F-14 you are using?
  17. looks like GreenHell1?? GreehHell2 is out now
  18. Its your PC thats the problem - or the state its currently in - would even recommend bumping up the RAM to at least 2GB if you havnt already
  19. Its on here - you will need to register http://cplengineeringllc.com/SFP1/
  20. Using an F-4C.ini as an example: [AircraftData] AircraftFullName=F-4C Phantom II AircraftDataFile=F-4C_data.ini CockpitDataFile=F-4C_cockpit.ini HangarScreen=F-4C_hangar.bmp <------ check this is exactly the same file name as your hangar screen LoadoutImage=F-4C_loadout.bmp .......... If thats there and the file is in the F-14s folder then check if the bit depth is 24 bit - right click ->properties->summary->advanced button
  21. Do you remap the in game F8 and F9 keys - by default Track IR uses them - F8 does slow down the TIR considerably when pressed. Are you using a default profile - with TIR4 it worked out of the box for me - as responsive as any other game
  22. And if you cut and paste the altered files out to another location does the game work okay?
  23. Not that I know of - it should say with the readme that comes with the download The Falklands campaign is for SFP1 I believe
  24. Hmm I was wondering why the Russians wouldnt think to destroy the Polish missile bases first - then launch their ICBMs if they had to go that way - I will send em an email Saw this on the bbc - I didnt think Syria could afford JS tbh http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7574311.stm I imagine relations will worsen for a bit - and they may get better or may get worse - who knows - and for more top analysis on Current Affairs PM me
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..