+comrpnt Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 now we need a herc with a tail-hook! You may want to try adding the following to the C-130 _data.ini file...it worked for the A-3B I used in VMFA-531 Mission Pack 1 :-) // In the Fuselage section add a new SystemName reference...where XXX is the next number is sequence... [Fuselage]... SystemName[XXX]=Tailhook // And also add the following Tailhook section, usually near the end of the _DATA.INI file. [Tailhook] SystemType=ARRESTER_HOOK MaxDeflection=60.0 Retractable=TRUE DeployTime=2.0 ModelNodeName=tailhook HookArmLength=2.16 AttachmentPosition=0.0,-5.59,-0.79 Regards, comrpnt. Quote
FastCargo Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 a few other "interesting" carrier ops - one of these is actually real...... Yep, didn't even need a tailhook... FastCargo Quote
Wrench Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 That would be the U-2. I'm surprised the X-Wing's off the deck....I guess that pilot forgot about his repulsor lifts; coulda just hovered over the deck and landed like a helo!!! Wrench kevin stein Quote
+Brainless Posted March 14, 2008 Author Posted March 14, 2008 a few other "interesting" carrier ops - one of these is actually real...... The bottom pic on the right looks like one of my early carrier landings. Bit like Wrench's early ones. Quote
+Typhoid Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 You may want to try adding the following to the C-130 _data.ini file...it worked for the A-3B I used in VMFA-531 Mission Pack 1 :-) // In the Fuselage section add a new SystemName reference...where XXX is the next number is sequence... [Fuselage]... SystemName[XXX]=Tailhook // And also add the following Tailhook section, usually near the end of the _DATA.INI file. [Tailhook] SystemType=ARRESTER_HOOK MaxDeflection=60.0 Retractable=TRUE DeployTime=2.0 ModelNodeName=tailhook HookArmLength=2.16 AttachmentPosition=0.0,-5.59,-0.79 Regards, comrpnt. no tailhook for the C-130. You have to land it like a MAN. Reverse props while still airborne!! :yes: Quote
MigBuster Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 no tailhook for the C-130. You have to land it like a MAN. Reverse props while still airborne!! :yes: Someones posted a vid doing that http://forum.combatace.com/index.php?showt...=26416&st=0 Theres also one of Nicky landing like a Girl Quote
+Brainless Posted March 14, 2008 Author Posted March 14, 2008 I expect you thought that when I got to this point I was a bit worried. Well I was a bit 'cos I seemed to be a bit high so had to go round. Quote
Czech6 Posted March 15, 2008 Posted March 15, 2008 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4015390308129405896 Quote
csevers Posted March 15, 2008 Posted March 15, 2008 I always land manually, but I find I need to turn the cockpit off in order to actually see the deck when I am at the correct attitude and speed. I keep it on until I roll out on final and then switch it off when I lose sight. Quote
Stick Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 Any way of having airplanes parked on the deck?That ought to make the landings a little more hairy! I use Digital Overload for Red swarm in WOE So Im yes I might just be advertising my ignorance! Quote
+kreelin Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 Now better.... A C130A landing on "tiny" French carrier Clemenceau. This is completely irrelevant but so fun to try.. http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=3-mMzEM45i4 Quote
+Jug Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 Love deck landing. Especially the Passionate Pachyderm, the RA5C. I never let the computer land it, no matter what condition I'm coming back in from "up north." Don't fly the A-6 much, usually the Phantom or Crusader, my two favorites, or the A-4 Scooter. Waiting for the new release of the Mirage Factory's new A-7, which looks to be just as good as their Gunfighter. Real men don't use asphalt. Heck Then again, real men don't need anyone to tell them how to be real men! You are or your are not. Quote
+Jug Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 What about this one.... Fully manual carrier landing http://www.dailymotion.com/_kreelin_/video/7880825 Wow! That is impressive. Quote
+Brainless Posted March 16, 2008 Author Posted March 16, 2008 What no comments/jokes/exclamations on my last post. I'm flying a Lancacster here guys. Quote
+Jug Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 a few other "interesting" carrier ops - one of these is actually real...... The only real picture here is the U-2, which was fully carrier qualified. Had a tailhook that could be installed, the flaps could be adjusted to go 40 degrees down (normal max is 30 degrees), and the wingtips folded to get down the ship's elevator. It was so easy with an approach speed of 70 mph that the carrier normally would have to slow down. With a good sea breeze, you could literally hover over the deck and fly to the space they wanted you to park. After landing the carrier had to slow to just headway until the U-2 was stored as it has a tendency to fly off of the deck unless clamped down securely. NAS Lemoore had a carrier deck painted on its landing strip and we used to fly down to practice there from Beale AFB, CA. No offense to the tailhook types, but there really wasn't much to it. Have to admit that I never tried it in a Rhino at night and in a bad sea state (except in this sim). My hat is off to those who have done so. Quote
+Viggen Posted March 16, 2008 Posted March 16, 2008 Jug, where you qualified for landing the U-2 on carriers? Quote
+Typhoid Posted March 18, 2008 Posted March 18, 2008 (edited) The only real picture here is the U-2, which was fully carrier qualified. Had a tailhook that could be installed, the flaps could be adjusted to go 40 degrees down (normal max is 30 degrees), and the wingtips folded to get down the ship's elevator. It was so easy with an approach speed of 70 mph that the carrier normally would have to slow down. With a good sea breeze, you could literally hover over the deck and fly to the space they wanted you to park. After landing the carrier had to slow to just headway until the U-2 was stored as it has a tendency to fly off of the deck unless clamped down securely. NAS Lemoore had a carrier deck painted on its landing strip and we used to fly down to practice there from Beale AFB, CA. No offense to the tailhook types, but there really wasn't much to it. Have to admit that I never tried it in a Rhino at night and in a bad sea state (except in this sim). My hat is off to those who have done so. that doesn't quite sound exactly right in several points. Where did you get that info? some of it is correct and there were a few ops, but the handling that you mention is a bit far fetched. http://www.afa.org/magazine/feb2001/0201spyplane.asp Edited March 18, 2008 by Typhoid Quote
csevers Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 that doesn't quite sound exactly right in several points. Where did you get that info? some of it is correct and there were a few ops, but the handling that you mention is a bit far fetched. http://www.afa.org/magazine/feb2001/0201spyplane.asp You might want to read this interview with Jug and then think again about whether or not his comments are accurate. Quote
+Spectre_USA Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 Also, it is fairly evident from what he typed as to where he got the info, himself, and other U2 pilots that lived it with him... Quote
+Typhoid Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 (edited) Also, it is fairly evident from what he typed as to where he got the info, himself, and other U2 pilots that lived it with him... that is what it sounds like, but his description of ship handling and deck spotting is waaaaaaay off. so I am thinking that perhaps he is quoting someone else? who was engaged in a bit of a sea-story on a few minor points? Edited March 19, 2008 by Typhoid Quote
JediMaster Posted March 19, 2008 Posted March 19, 2008 I'm guessing you're taking his "fly to the point you want to park" literally. I doubt he was being precise. It's probably more a comment on the slow approach speed compared to land ops, nothing more. As for the slowing down of the carrier, I don't see anything unusual about that. U-2 ops were not common, but the exception, and I'm sure special adjustments were made for them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.