PraetorH Posted March 24, 2011 Posted March 24, 2011 (edited) There was no ban on the export of the A-10 and certainly for busting Soviet tanks other nations than the US had an equal if not greater interest... It is just that those nations (continental European NATO) had just used up their financial resources on their own projects, and one of those, the Tornado, was supposed to be their tank buster. PS: if you think that is a sacrilege, you better should not see my current project on a US bird Edited March 24, 2011 by PraetorHonoris
FrankD Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 (edited) There was no ban on the export of the A-10 and certainly for busting Soviet tanks other nations than the US had an equal if not greater interest... It is just that those nations (continental European NATO) had just used up their financial resources on their own projects, and one of those, the Tornado, was supposed to be their tank buster. PS: if you think that is a sacrilege, you better should not see my current project on a US bird Ey, what about a Multinational NATO A-10 Force with Luxembourgers' markings, ala Sentry? Edited March 25, 2011 by FrankD
Slartibartfast Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 There was no ban on the export of the A-10 and certainly for busting Soviet tanks other nations than the US had an equal if not greater interest... It is just that those nations (continental European NATO) had just used up their financial resources on their own projects, and one of those, the Tornado, was supposed to be their tank buster. PS: if you think that is a sacrilege, you better should not see my current project on a US bird Better not be a Tomcat in Iranian markings... or Libyian Markings... damn forgot the first one is real
PraetorH Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 (edited) Ey, what about a Multinational NATO A-10 Force with Luxembourgers' markings, ala Sentry?[/size][/font] Blast! That is a great idea - it's on the list (which is unfortunatly quite long already...) Better not be a Tomcat in Iranian markings... or Libyian Markings... damn forgot the first one is real Nah, still within NATO. Although, now as you mentioned it... Edited March 25, 2011 by PraetorHonoris
Spinners Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 naa, a-10 shd always be US;anything else is sacrilege. And why is that then?
dsawan Posted March 25, 2011 Posted March 25, 2011 (edited) Can;t give everything away, he he The a-10 is like the trump card. Edited March 25, 2011 by dsawan
PraetorH Posted March 26, 2011 Posted March 26, 2011 (edited) A-5G Back-story and more pics here: http://combatace.com/topic/63800-anything-goes-a-5-sac-and-luftwaffe/ Edited March 26, 2011 by PraetorHonoris
Spinners Posted March 26, 2011 Posted March 26, 2011 (edited) BAe/Convair Corona FG.3 - 800 Naval Air Squadron, Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm, 1991 Edited March 26, 2011 by Spinners
Spinners Posted March 27, 2011 Posted March 27, 2011 BAe/Convair Corona FG.1 - No.6 Squadron, RAF Middle East Command, 2011
+russouk2004 Posted March 29, 2011 Posted March 29, 2011 (edited) Edited March 29, 2011 by russouk2004
Spinners Posted March 29, 2011 Posted March 29, 2011 Blackburn Firebrand FB.6 - No.30 Squadron, RAF SEAC, 1949
Spinners Posted March 31, 2011 Posted March 31, 2011 Avro Antrim B.1 - No.49 Squadron, RAF Bomber Command, 1949
+Wrench Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 (edited) did that in 2007 (at least, that's the date on the _data.ini)... called it "Viking Mk.3" to keep with the V-Bomber family (have it in anti-flash white too) wrench kevin stein Edited April 1, 2011 by Wrench
Spinners Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 did that in 2007 Not quite Kevin. Mine is the prop job whilst yours appears to be a jet. Lovely work though!
PraetorH Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 Somehow I doubt Croatia would need such a plane Still very nice, russouk!
+Wrench Posted April 1, 2011 Posted April 1, 2011 I stand corrected .. somehow didn't notice the props!! (old age????) You want the Viking? I'll never find time to finsh it off... wrench kevin stein
Spinners Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Rockwell F-13A - No.805 Squadron, Royal Australian Navy, 1979 I stand corrected .. somehow didn't notice the props!! (old age????) You want the Viking? I'll never find time to finsh it off... Yes, it'll be nice to show the folks over at the 'what if modelers' website - thank you.
+Julhelm Posted April 3, 2011 Posted April 3, 2011 Correct designation for that would be FV-12, as would the Convair 201 I think. Both being SCS fighter designs.
Spinners Posted April 3, 2011 Posted April 3, 2011 Not too sure about that because of the existence of the YF-12A (the Blackbird based interceptor).
Gunrunner Posted April 3, 2011 Posted April 3, 2011 Wrong Spinners, even though the 12th slot for the F- series was indeed attributed to the interceptor variant of the A-12/SR-71, FV-12 is not a F- series slot, but a V- series one (like OV-1, OV-10, MV-22, AV-8 and a few others). Thus FV-12 is free and was indeed reserved for that program.
Gunrunner Posted April 3, 2011 Posted April 3, 2011 To be fair the nomenclature is sometimes quite confusing if not confused and has a lot of exceptions and peculiarities.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now