Deutsche Deltas

[ValAstur 1,222]

Dassault Mirage IIIEG - JG 71 "Richthofen" Norm 72 Camo - ca. 1974

 

Dassault Mirage IIIEG - JG 71 "Richthofen" Norm 81B Camo - 1983

 

Dassault Mirage 5G - Marinefliegergeschwader 2 Norm 76 Camo - 1977

 

Dassault Mirage 5G - JBG 31 "Boelcke" Norm 76 Camo - 1978

 

Dassault Mirage 5G - JBG 31 "Boelcke" Norm 83 Camo - 1984

Edited May 1, 2019 by ValAstur

[Spinners 15,981]

Very well executed. Superb!

[Stratos 3,177]

Top notch, pretty realitic and amazingly well done. Congratulations Mario!

[+Gepard 10,622]

Nice job.

Could be please relocate the tactical numbers and the iron cross from tail to the nose section.

Like in these screenshot:

[+daddyairplanes 9,127]

i see both sides of that coin

to paraphrase Bob Ross, theres no mistakes its the modders world    buuuut

as a alt history/counterfactual fan one should make the minimum changes possible in the revised scenario

I see this as a good alternative to buying American, esp. after the scandal surrounding the Starfighter purchase

[fallenphoenix1986 603]

As much as I have a soft spot for the 104... the Mirage just makes so much more sense for Germany.

[dsawan 615]

agreed; you outdid yurself. Hoping for a release

[+Gepard 10,622]

22 hours ago, fallenphoenix1986 said:

As much as I have a soft spot for the 104... the Mirage just makes so much more sense for Germany.

So it was. The Mirage III was the favorit in the competition for the F-86 Sabre successor of the Bundesluftwaffe. Then Lockheed salesmen had a longer, intense talk with the german minister of defence F.J.Strauß. Some decent pressure by the american embassy followed and some money was handed over in black briefcases.

After this the F-104G became the plane of choice and when the background of the deal came out the Federal Republic of Germany had a first big scandal. Which came even worse when the Starfighter achieved his reputation as "Widowmaker".

[fallenphoenix1986 603]

Risking incurring wrath for violating the no quoting screenies policy, but it is for a reason...

On 5/1/2019 at 1:30 PM, ValAstur said:

We can drop individual tanks? 

I've been playing this game since 2000-and-dot and didn't know this 

[+Nyghtfall 2,151]

21 minutes ago, fallenphoenix1986 said:

Risking incurring wrath for violating the no quoting screenies policy, but it is for a reason...

We can drop individual tanks? 

I've been playing this game since 2000-and-dot and didn't know this 

I guess, the wingtanks are not jettisonable, so they stay were they are.

[Wrench 9,616]

no, that's from a fuck up in the loadout and data inis. don't forget, all drop tanks are part of the main aircraft LOD, and if things dont match (outdated data ini for instance, or misnamed loadout) weird shit like this happens. 

Examples can be seen a lot, the most I've seen are on Intruders and Prowlers

[ValAstur 1,222]

On 1.5.2019 at 3:16 PM, Gepard said:

Nice job.

Could be please relocate the tactical numbers and the iron cross from tail to the nose section.

 

Changes have been applied to all aircraft.

 

3 hours ago, Wrench said:

no, that's from a fuck up in the loadout and data inis. don't forget, all drop tanks are part of the main aircraft LOD, and if things dont match (outdated data ini for instance, or misnamed loadout) weird shit like this happens. 

Examples can be seen a lot, the most I've seen are on Intruders and Prowlers

In the data.ini of the Mirage IIIOA, on which the Mirage IIIEG is based on, both the supersonic tanks and the RPKs had the entry of"NoJettisionTank=TRUE" included. I removed it and now it works.

On 1.5.2019 at 11:03 PM, dsawan said:

agreed; you outdid yurself. Hoping for a release

Just saw an error on the Norm 72 Camo of the Mirage IIIEG. When its fixed, I'll upload it.

[ValAstur 1,222]

Uploaded and awaiting approval

[+Gepard 10,622]

Well done.

Nice bird.