Julhelm

Because it's an attractive plane and it would be cool to see a "modernized" Vigi.

I like it a lot. I wonder what could be done to a Vigilante using the same ideas.

But he's a bad guy and the world is split between Good Guys and Bad Guys . The Bad Guys hate America :(

The reversed highlight on the left throttle handle looks really weird. And maybe you could make the MFD pages more uniform in sharpness? The HSI is sharp and crisp but the UFC and SMS are blurry. Oh, and don't forget teh bolts on the consoles :P Oh btw Brain, I have a font for the instrument panel which is much closer to the real one than Arial or whatever we usually use.

Convair Model 201 Template View File Template for the Convair Model 201 Shipboard Fighter. Includes specular layer and a sample Hi-Viz USN scheme with all stencils and details. Droptanks included. Submitter Julhelm Submitted 06/24/2012 Category Utilities / Editors

You did? Nice. Btw any skins for the FSX version will work with this. All you have to do is flip the image vertically

Turkey also has an out and out islamist government elected by democratic vote whom are mostly kept in check by the constitution and the military. So yeah.

Uploading the template right now.

I'll let you prove me wrong by naming any arab state that is a western style secular democracy. Oh look, could it be that in the middle east where the only education most people encounter is quran studies, democracy invariably ends up voting religious nutters into power?

View File Convair Model 201 Shipboard Fighter Convair Model 201 for Strike Fighters 2 ---------------------------------------------- What this is : This is the CTOL version of Convair's Model 200 VSTOL entry for the Sea Control Ship fighter competition of the early 70's. It also reappeared later as GD Model 218 during the VFAX competition which ultimately ended up as the F-18. There are quite a number of artist's impressions and 3-view floating around, of which most ones show a more pointy delta planform and underwing Sidewinders. That would be the earlier iterations, which by 1975 or so would have evolved into what you see here. The original documentation only mentions 2 AIM-9 + 2 AIM-7 but I added 2 underwing and a centerline station because it makes the plane a bit more fun to use and isn't totally implausible. ---------------------------------------------- More Stuff: It uses sounds from SF2E so your mileage may vary :o ---------------------------------------------- Known Issues: None, really. ---------------------------------------------- Credits: Models & textures & FM by Julhelm As usual, these files may not be used in payware or otherwise tampered with and reposted without my consent which you may request on Combatace forum. This message will self destruct in five seconds. Submitter Julhelm Submitted 06/24/2012 Category What If Hangar  

Well as it turned out they were so your point is? Apparently western people think that with arabs "We want DEMOCRACY" means "We want to be like Americans" whereas in reality it is "We want ISLAMISM and to bomb the f*** out of teh JEWS".

About as Islamist as Khaddafi was, duh. I always thought NATO was about opposing the Russians, not replacing secular tinpot dictators with islamist nutters who will bring terror to us europeans.

So people are all for NATO bombing away Assad so he can be replaced with whatever Islamists/Al Quaida are posing as "freedom fighters", like in Libya. Yeah, that's progress alright.

Well I'm running a HD5850 so it probably has nothing to do with the gfx cards. If Fubar has a version that works he can release it.

Happy birthday

The plot is profoundly retarded, though. Still an entertaining read.

No idea. It works for me?

Why would you need to surface? Hold at periscope depth and extend the gun barrel like a mast to broach.

Fancy a real tactical shooter developed by some of the original Rainbow 6, Rogue Spear and Ghost Recon devs and co-designed by real special forces operators? Well, here's your chance to get one:

Convert the detail texture into a 2x2px texture and it'll give it that checkerboard quality of the good old games.

Why would you place a system like this on a large, vulnerable surface ship? Turn it into a module akin to the AGS that can fit in the tubes of a Trident sub, instead.

I always thought the small deck carriers didn't operate F-14 because not enough F-14's were built to replace all the F-4s. IIRC the F-111B did its carrier quals on the small deck carrier.

It had a lower approach speed compared to the Tomcat.