yakarov79

kids

Then don't. Buy a burger. Here, all mods are free.

No. I tested it many times. Not in this case. I have a habit of playing test flights for all my work...now and then. Flight - always 8 aircraft for every skin/squadron set - to have a wide view of decals within the squadron, every possible loadout. The answer is here I always try to upload everything in the max possible resolution so the end user can resize down if needed. I mostly play on 3072 or 2048 skins....But, again, I upload 4K. i do not recommend changing BUMP maps into jpg. - The game will have a tendency to read stock files instead, and then you will have mismatched "skin paint" features. So, bump files bmp. Can go down to 3072 too. Screens below are still in 4096. I have exactly the same stuff as you. Tested many times. Recently, 14 minutes ago.

as for SF2 - you can have just a base game...and with all mods here on CA...you can have lot of fun. DLCs? Maybe some. But guys here modded everything that was about to mod. And sometimes making stuff better than in the DLC or in the original game. And they are still modding and have some work on their hands.

It is not that. Files should be fine...works on my end. Double-checked before uploading.

That's the point exactly. And... before the modder gets hype on the new tool....well, this also gives others access to said modder's files too... So I guess it should be some kind of general agreement between all and every. Or there will be a lot of bad blood i consider myself a youngblood in the modding community here... yes and no. We all know why. Can we go to the modder round table with this? But it is up to gerwin.

way to fix some bugs on models....

Your Phantom on screenie....VMFA-334 is a Marine unit, not a Navy unit. Hope it is just a bloob... I think (If I remember correctly) RF-8 in batch BuNo 146 serials started somewhere at 822. That on-screenie RF is suggesting Ticonderoga on CVW-16, 1969 cruise. So it needs to be RF-8G. It is just my 5 cents. In a way, I like your work, guys. But going for historical accuracy takes time and a shitload of research. Original YAP lacked there little. Revamped too. I am not saying this in a bad way...more like to encourage you. keep good work.

Ho ho ho… u might be in right company here

It works with stock RAF Lightning. And with my F-86D. -which is based on stock Lightning. We have also a "gun pod-rocket pod"; it also works, in a way.... But you can not defend shit with that. But with nice formation flying, I was able to score hits 8- F-86D vs. 6 - Tu-something. 8:0

I am actually with Sundowner on that. Another thing is that TK said it: do what you want with the game. I think Stratos knows something more about it. But I think ages ago, when he said - do what you want - he meant: go on fuckers, you're not gonna do screw anything with it anyway....Well, it is 2026, and some crazy shit is happening with AI... So if someone can use it to make some good things in our small virtual worlds. I might be fine with it. Anyway, if it is some install-over-the-top mod that modifies original files in some way... why not...

yea...we got that... No one is reading it anyway...

Using SF1 flight model might not be a good idea in SF2. Soon*, there will be an upload of new variants with new ini files, and an update of already released zippers - earlier this year/last year. With avionics and the flight model reworked by alfa2. You can always go to the download section, SF2 - Cold War - US origin -and then the subsection that is interesting for you. * proverbial fortnight.

obviously. You can.