JonathanRL

View File Flottilj 22 Dhimar Dhimar, 1959. The Swedish Goverment, buying most of their oil from Dhimar has decided to deploy Fighters to the region of Dhimar to aid the defence of the Kingdom. This is the first war for the Swedes in 150 years... Information: This campaign will not overwrite anything, and is a minimal change from the SF2 Campaign. It will add Division 22, a Swedish Squadron flying the J-29F Tunnan or the DLC J-34 Hawker Hunter in the defence of the Dhimari Empire during the 59´ Campaign. The idea for this is from an AAR I posted with a custom made campaign, and some players of the game asked for a playable copy, with a minimal of hazzle. As such, all you need is included. However, instead of the J-35A Upgrade, i decided to include a What-If "Field Refit" of the J-29F, nicknamed the JA-29D. The campaign will upgrade to this aircraft in 1963, since I belive this is more plauable then new aircraft being sent down. The J29F is made by Wrench, and the readme is included. Big thanks to him for supplying it. To fly the J34 Hawker Hunter in the campaign, you must own the DLC. I really recommend picking it up. That is about all... Happy huntin! 1.1 - A Beta tester playing only in SF2 reported Cockpit problems with the J29F. A fix has been included to remedy this if it appears. - Fixed a bug where the J-34 Hawker Hunter DLC would not appear in the Campaign. Submitter JonathanRL Submitted 08/29/2011 Category User Made Campaigns

Freespace 2 is based around Subspace Nodes - aka space gates. Sounds more like he want a sandbox style game.

DAMNIT! And I am out of money, too :( ...my only hope is TK sending me a review copy :D

I may be giving OFF to much credit, never having played it - but maybe the game allows for one of your wingmen seeing you downing the aircraft and filing the claim for you?

...damn. Was fearing this ever since I heard the news. Bloody hell :(

Seems like NATO Figthers getting some competition, eh? :D

You could fly Jets in BF2 as well. They where popular to fly too.

Black Ops ruins it by having most of the weapons being "prototypes" of modern ones. Few weapons - aside from the iconic ones - are actually from the era. This list pretty much sums it all up: http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Black_Ops

Both Vietcong (the first one, VC2 is crap) and the BC2 DLC is gold. Theese should be tested.

Awesome Ride!

That was quick! However, I feel the price was a little hefty for anybody who owns Israel and easily can add the Shakak cockpit to the IIIC. Good for everybody else tought, and nice to see a AI plane flyable as DLC.

The Aircraft used in Hot Shots are Folland Gnats, are they not?

They cant hit anything when there is more targets then sea either ;-)

The newest versions are auto-patching. Also, if you recently downloaded them, they are already up to date.

I wonder why he did not add Swedish Skins to the Dutch Hunter. Its almost the same aircraft as Designation J34...

Tack så jävla mycket, det ska bli ett sant nöje att plocka upp F22s gamla favorit i luften mot lede fi! ;-) Thank you for your effort. I really appreciate it, and will now fly my brains out! :D

Gaaaah. Why does this have to happen when I have no money?

Where can I find a changelist?

I had missed that one as well. No more bloody .ini tampering. It looks decent, but works for me. Here is how the Spitfire looks with that command, and no added Cockpit.

Aight, settle down. I know this may stir the hornets nest, but simply put - there is no way that Modern Warfare 3 can beat Battlefield 3. While I still maintain they are two different kinds of games, many observe that Bad Company 2 was trying to be more like Call of Duty. I do not agree. Bad Company 2 was a transfer, from a large, battlefield map into a more close quarters tactical format. There are many who never got past the Rush or Squad DM modes in Bad Company, and even as a devoted Battlefield Fan, I am among them. Until I played Conquest for a few hours, I had felt Bad Company 2 to be the black sheep of the series. There are of course really big maps for Bad Company 2 as well, but due to the player limit, they are not used to their full potential. It still is not what Call of Duty is. Call of Duty is a Squad Deathmatch game, in the same formula as Counterstrike. Tough you can just as well remove "Squad". When I have played Call of Duty Online, your teammates are more people you choose not to shoot rather then someone who help you defeat the enemy. Winning and loosing matches seem not to matter to most players, as they go for personal scores. CoD has gone a long way from the slogan "In the War that changed the world, nobody fights alone." Battlefield is different. Here, teamplay is emphasized and a critical part of gameplay. Vechicles are not unlocked by kill streaks, but is a natural part of gameplay. Anybody can pick one up. In Short, it is what the name suggests. A Battlefield. To this day, we know next to nothing about Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3. We seen some action from a heavily scripted campaign from Battlefield 3 and while I applaud their dedication to the Single Player experiance, there is no need for it. Honestly. If you say Battlefield, I say "Multiplayer". And so does all the other fans. CoD on the other hand has been a clear Single Player title. And it was good at it. Its only lately when Multiplayer has become more important that its multiplayer part moved away from the basic "Shoot the enemy" formula. Now its "shoot the enemy, while random stuff happens on the screen". I cared little for the Bad Company team. They where fun, they are entertaining to play with, but I would not bat an eyelash if anybody of them died. Anybody remember a slightly different sensation at the end of CoD 4: Modern Warfare? It is the Counterstrike generation that drives CoD forward and I do not think its a good thing. CoD has gone stagnant. They refuse to adapt and develop. Black Ops tried to be Modern Warfare instead of take risks and the result was plain silly. In feel and touch, it was almost the same as the first Modern Warfare game. Battlefield has always tried to move forward. While it is a mistake of them to look to CoD for their Single Player, their return to the grand formula of big, grand battles where every player plays their part in a team will again win over the small, close quarters battles where your teammates are simply in the way. Not my two cents. But rather my two very big, G3 Assault Rifles.

Yea, I usually have problems having the IL-2 AI attack a ship that is dead ahead of them and activly shooting at them.

"Well, you'll still get mission accomplished, just not the Success rating (which goes with medals and promotions). We'll see what everone else thinks, but it was one of the changes requested by others users." - Thirdwire on FB

Oh dear. Iron Eagle, the most cheesy flight flick there is. I have to check em out again : D Also... "ALERT ! WE GOT MIGS! MIG-29s! SCRAMBLE SCRAMBLE!" *F-4 Phantoms Land at base...*