MigBuster

In this the Diamond probably signifies the TEWS has classified the signature as a priority target. You will only see this display on post 1978 jets - the older ones will have a basic vector RHAW scope.

Air Force 1 anyone? Yes Top Gun is actually pretty good - one of the stronger Hollywood offerings IMO

This might be coming with the vastly improved F-16C model:

This guy was lucky - so was the bird..... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-15554333

Thats a great job by the pilot - truly amazing

Fantastic!!

So you installed the patch on a modded install and now its not working. Is this the SF2 stock A-10A?

Normal HUD will keep those messages. For more control over labels etc you can also extract and edit the HUDData.ini

Have a great Birthday chaps

DLCs ive found tend to initialise the install the same way a patch does - bit of a pain for modded installs

Cut out the folder C:\Users\<you>\Saved Games\ThirdWire and paste it to a very safe location then try the games Actually....... try Malibus suggestion first!!

2. In the The Weapons editor there is a Station Code box - and you can put something like AIM54A in there for the AIM-54A and save it. Then on the F-14s weapons stations in the F-14A_Data.ini - find where the phoenix go and add the line: ....... LoadLimit=226.8 LoadLimit=650 AllowedWeaponClass=AHM AttachmentType=USN SpecificStationCode=AIM54 <------------ 3. Pretty much I believe - you could make the carrier a Cargo ship type or something but I dont think you can land on it if you do that.....been a while

Yes thats a fantastic episode

Have a lot of F-4M photos carrying the standard wing drops and an SUU-23 on the centreline.

Somewhere in the 1960s - fast jets with **** missiles

That sure is strange! You might be using an old ini file somewhere that you need to update or remove from the mods folders.

Happy Birthday

Amazing work - very well done

RIP - not good

The F-16AMs are looking pretty special now

You can run........you can hide............just not forever. oh well good news for Libya I hope....will see

Wouldn't normally bother but the amount of things being written about the UK banks over the past few years would lead you to believe there is something fundamentally corrupt and wrong with the system. As for CEOs sitting at the top raking in the money - they have ****ed everything up economy wise and and tax payers are having to STILL bail them out - so either they are not working hard or plainly they are employing a bunch of retards in the wrong positions that need to be replaced. Not content on us bailing them out and the majority being government /part owned again they are now refusing to lend to get the economy going and reportedly spending millions of tax payers money on bonuses they have no right to receive on current performance - but dont worry their profits are going up (phew). If any of this is true they need to be brought under control and crushed quickly - and the perpetrators at the top particularly the CEO/CIOs etc need to be sacked for doing one hell of a **** job. At the moment Bankers have as much cred as rapists over here.......

Gawd - well people including me have assumed he got out okay - without bothering to check it might have been a dual seater! RIP

Think you might be right: I've worked with F-18A/B/C/D/E aircraft for over 17 years. There has not been a flight clearance for the AIM-120 on the wingtip stations. The F-18A-D will only fly with a LAU-7 launcher on the wingtips which will only accomidate varients of the AIM-9 missile. The F-18E/F has a LAU-127 launcher loaded on the wingtips. It can carry both AIM-9 and AIM-120 missiles. However, there is only flight clearance for the AIM-9 currently. Nothing in the works at present for the AIM-120. I agree, 120 loaded on wingtip will put enormous stress on the wingfold transmissions as well as the mounting hardware for the launcher itself. http://combatace.com/topic/48322-aim-120-on-hornet-wingtips/

Pretty sure its about reducing wing flutter, although I would rather have an AIM-120 over an AIM-9 for self defence any day. See this site for answers http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-11355-view-next.html Anything with John Wills name in it is pretty good - being one of the original F-16 engineers!!