Sheriff001 Posted February 8, 2016 Posted February 8, 2016 (edited) CF-110K Phantom II - Canadian Forces Maritime Command Based on CF CP-121 Tracker markings post-1968 Edited February 8, 2016 by Sheriff001 3 Quote
Spinners Posted February 8, 2016 Posted February 8, 2016 Why not? It is the what if screenshot thread after all! Quote
+dtmdragon Posted February 9, 2016 Posted February 9, 2016 F-39A Block 5 Griffin 64th AS "Aggressors" 9 Quote
Spinners Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Corsair GR.3 - No.14 Squadron, Royal Air Force, 1986 5 Quote
+dtmdragon Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Corsair GR.3 - No.14 Squadron, Royal Air Force, 1986 Very cool mate. I wonder if the A-7 was ever considered for the RAF in real life? Quote
Spinners Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Very cool mate. I wonder if the A-7 was ever considered for the RAF in real life? I don't think so as the UK was just recovering from a succession of cancelled projects and teaming up with our European neighbours. Quote
Sheriff001 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) RAAF RF-4E (just) over North Vietnam. This one is just about ready to release. Alone, unarmed, unafraid. Edited February 14, 2016 by Sheriff001 4 Quote
+yakarov79 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 What if they did not cancel order? Australian snake. 9 Quote
Sheriff001 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Very good! Just one thing, you might want to reverse the kangaroo on the right-hand side. The kangaroo always faces forwards. 1 Quote
Constellation1710 Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Spinners http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/RAFVANCOUVERB101.jpg[/img]It's nice to see a picture of the B-36 with it's turrets extended... http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/WHAT%20IF%202011/RAFANTRIMB101.jpg[/img]I'm not sure if you took creative license, but the XB-35 didn't have the turret arrangement you put on it: The actual design had the following 4 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the tail4 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the central dorsal blister4 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the central ventral blister2 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the port dorsal blister2 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the starboard dorsal blister2 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the starboard ventral blister2 x 12.7mm (retractible) in the port ventral blister For a total of 20 x 12.7mm http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/WHAT%20IF%202011/USNF-14A02.jpg[/img]That wasn't too far off, the F-14A's really were in the skies in the final days of Vietnam. We were no longer fighting a war anymore, but, we were there. http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/WHAT%20IF%202011/LUFTWAFFETHUNDERCEPTOR06.jpg[/img]The XF-90 was quite an interesting aircraft with a breathtaking rate of climb for it's era. The wing-design was so strange it was kind of cool in it's own right. http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/WHAT%20IF%202011/USNF-4EUPHANTOM04.jpg[/img]The US Navy really could have used some gun equipped F-4's in Vietnam. I love this design! Is this something you came up with, or was this an actual aircraft? http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202010/WHAT%20IF%202011/MARINEFLIEGERF-11DTIGER03.jpg[/img]It's a shame the F11F-2/F12F never flew in service. http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/hh173/SPINNERS1961/WHAT%20IF%202013/FLYGVAPNETF-32A01_zpsad0e65ce.jpg[/img]What a fascinating design: To whoever made it, they did a fantastic job. PraetorH While this isn't in your posted images, what paintjob is that? mdatelmi http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_03_2011/post-9039-034208000%201299101567.jpg[/img]B-1R: The Missile Truck http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_03_2011/post-9039-067514400%201299101582.jpg[/img]The X-29 looks good in combat Sundowner http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_03_2011/post-841-049423100%201299097496.jpg[/img]The B-58A was a great aircraft, and often highly underrated. http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_02_2016/post-841-0-70079700-1455045159.jpg[/img]I have a great respect for model builders in general, but a special respect for people who can build their own designs. EricJ http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_02_2011/post-5735-025915100%201298866070.jpg[/img]You really got the textures and skin detail down-pat http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_10_2011/post-5735-0-27928100-1319552715.jpg[/img]The digital camouflage looks great... http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2011/post-5735-0-30215600-1323701505.jpg[/img] http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_12_2011/post-5735-0-82420200-1323701514.jpg[/img] The XF-103 was one of those designs that, while not terribly practical were freaking awesome in appearance Monty CZ http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_03_2011/post-255-0-01060500-1301156897.jpg[/img] I've never heard of the AST-2 before, but I gotta say I love the design: It has many XF5U traits combined with what looks like lots a dakka... Val Astur http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_08_2011/post-4739-0-37830700-1314205569.jpg[/img]I gotta give you credit, the F-14 looks good in IAF colors. Centurion-1 http://combatace.com/uploads/gallery/album_669/gallery_19311_669_199346.jpg[/img]Good camo, simple, but effective enough. FastCargo http://combatace.com/uploads/monthly_04_2010/post-12105-1271041395574.jpg[/img]The CF-105 Arrow was a fantastic design with truly remarkable capability. russouk2004 http://combatace.com/uploads/post-1981-0-37494300-1367813719.jpg[/img] http://combatace.com/uploads/post-1981-0-16934400-1367813726.jpg[/img] That's incredible: Have you given it a name? Quote
Spinners Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 MiG-27N - Soviet Air Force, Korea, 1982 4 Quote
Spinners Posted February 14, 2016 Posted February 14, 2016 Canberra PR.7 - No.13 Squadron, Royal Air Force, 1961 (Only a slight 'what if') 3 Quote
Spinners Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 F-105D in an experimental Vietnam camo 1 Quote
+Wrench Posted February 16, 2016 Posted February 16, 2016 the russian bird in question is a Yak-3RD. It's in the downloads section as to the "AST-1", that is pretty much the Vought XF5U, Unfortunately it was never (really) finished, and the author has not been around to do so. Some of us DO have it for our WW2 flying. I think my version is the "most complete" ini wise, but the model needs more work. But without 100% proof of "who done it", can't be released 2 Quote
Wilches Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 the russian bird in question is a Yak-3RD. It's in the downloads section as to the "AST-1", that is pretty much the Vought XF5U, Unfortunately it was never (really) finished, and the author has not been around to do so. Some of us DO have it for our WW2 flying. I think my version is the "most complete" ini wise, but the model needs more work. But without 100% proof of "who done it", can't be released That´s bad... Quote
+KnightWolf45 Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 i think i was from the aleks from the idiot team but im not sure! Quote
Spinners Posted February 21, 2016 Posted February 21, 2016 Hunter FGA.9 - Dhimari Crisis, 1961 6 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.