Stary

seems Dave purged his attachements, I am in the process of doing so as per Erik's request, I'll search if i have the first release archived found dated 19 February 15 but somehow can't attach to the post reply..? "This file failed to upload", 120 mb 7zip

Welcome gitrdun! as said above, your "el chapo" card seems to lack shader model 4.0 thus no DX10 eyecandies. So yes best way as Do335 said would be to use Gerwin's port of Iceland into older Dx9 friendly format, that version should work ok

Kevin I noticed on some of your _targets.ini files you tend to set the biggest possible effects for smallest structures, this might cause visual oddities

RIP maybe they wanted to do emergency landing on that dirt road?

as no one is going to say that, forget me for breaking the rule by saing something positive about Capun's -it's nice model, his stuff improves

excellent

is hiding the W10 update (so it displays as grey on the list) sufficient? I don't know how it's called on english version of W7, "hiding" might be not the best word

YS Flight has more -do we want to drown in YSFlight quality* models here too? Serious question... *which on it's own is lovely when you consider specific and adorable old school art direction of YSF

it's ini workaround I think but can't say for sure from top of myhead, so yeah could be to an extend -I guess you refer to the pilot's reactions to turns etc?

sure, can be tedious but when you know what causes some mismatches it's much easier later (hint: bucket tool )

that's some really ugly plane there

Kferge make sure the alpha layer on the water tiles matches colour/intensity of the water tiles in tileset you use (this case GH3.5) otehrwise your tiles will stand out as their specular/glossines will differ. Also some of these atolls could have smoother blue shallows to deeper sea transitions in diffuse

having fun with viewlist, plus I love that bulgarian camo

can't say which one is the best suited, personal preferences have a role here

yes it was gravitational oddities, but not really suprised as the idea was there for decades as for photography other than radar measurements I am not sure if there will be enough light that many AU away

Delta-Winged Mirages? here, few of them:

no worries, been digging through the posts backpages after 4 months of almost absence

be it slow work, matters the results are very appealing and drawing attention Kferge!

not buying it I mean nice as allways -or even better- but too sturdy airframe for 40.. make it 1936 pursuit aircraft Spinner and we're good

that said I must admit it the newest Spitfire cockpit shot is gorgeous

in SF2 right? Because these won't work in Series 1. Have you properly added these cockpits to the particular aircrafts? The "G" is for the new KAW "G" model, be sure to have it too

found it

can't say I understand you clearly

FernSquad to the rescue! but really Ed what is that plane?

Mue I might phrased it bit misleadingly but I think the engine populates the tiles with the TOD objects on the fly when the scene limits allow so -the terrains in the old pre NA format have statements about the maximum numbers of possible TOD objects spawned around player in the terrqain's _DATA.INI: example here: SolidObjectVertexCount=12288 SolidObjectIndexCount=18432 AlphaObjectVertexCount=8192 AlphaObjectIndexCount=12288 in my treemods I usually up these values twice or more as the draw ranges are now increased (via FLIGHTENGINE.INI DetailMeshSize= statements) to draw the TODs further away (thanks for your shaders too!) BUT when I lowered these values to zero I got no TOD objects, when it was small amounts only some of the meshes displayed on given corresponding tile. So I think the sim engine treats the TOD as more of objects data pool it uses to spawn the individual trees or buildings (or more accurately solidobjects and alphaobjects) on the given underlying tile, NOT as a single object- that also would make impossible to have the TODs populate slopes of any angle other than 0 degree of course. What is the biggest unknown for me, and your data seems to indicate is possible is if the TODs can have real 3D vertices orientation, meaning allowing more complex shapes than cubic/box ones (that can be done with 2.5D engine) As for "chance" value I do use it in some of my treemods for some buildings I for example don't want to spawn on every single tile in case that would create too obvious patterns. Say a barn near the field and such. That entry makes minimal usage though. Sorry Mue if I didn't make myself clear, am bit sleepy today