Jump to content

daddyairplanes

MODDER
  • Posts

    8,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    174

daddyairplanes last won the day on February 1

daddyairplanes had the most liked content!

About daddyairplanes

Recent Profile Visitors

55,166 profile views

daddyairplanes's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

12.5k

Reputation

  1. @angelp wicked to see you back and about to post. that said, what would be up with th U-2S that was in progress a couple of years back?
  2. so if any of the rest of us want to clean our rooms of this house, do i understand that its preferred to simply hide them? and if it is preferred to totally zonk them (preference by site staff not author) do you want to build a list up and handle it all at once or take it case by case? this thread reminds me that i've redone several of my earliest mods as my skills got better, and it would probablly be a good idea to remove most of my 2012-2014 work
  3. ini editing is easy learning what to edit it the tricky part
  4. which aircraft have 7 weapon station groups? what? ok, let make it simple. where are you from\? what? what aint no planet i ever heard of. do they speak English in what? w-w-what? ENGLISH MOTHERF^(&ER! DO YOU SPEAK IT?
  5. brother, ini files are one of the easiest things to edit in this game. Notepad(the software that comes with any windows version) and knowledge are all you need. as for postiions on aircraft, if you are talking one thats already in game, try Mue's LOD viewer to get you in the rough area. it wont tell you 7.26725, 5.0085 specific, but get you 7.27 and 5. you then play with the numbers to fine tune its better still at its designed purpose, helping view skin and decal edits without firing up teh game if youre talking about an aircraft that still need to be imported into the game, i'll defer that to the modellers but as to your original question, everyone who ever made a mod, even just a simple skin, had to edit an ini
  6. i think one is the more likely answer. there was less incentive to have BVR capability going into teh 90s and yet the AMRAAM portion of the ICE upgrade went forward yes, i know that started on paper in teh 80s, but look at how much got cancelled or scaled back when the Bear went into hibernation.......
  7. a scene pops in my head lately when the KB is mentioned
  8. im conflicted great back story. pretty sure it will get expanded with an ICE upgrade allowing AIM-120s (like a certain RL McAir product) but gawd, i thought Euro 1 on an Eagle was bad you couldt do at least Norm 81 instead? (note, if i got it wrong im sure someone will correct me. but pretty sure this is Norm 81) other note, not sure why they went to they trouble with the bombs on sparrow stations. the Eagle could always carry bombs on teh wing pylons (a fact the Israelis put to use bombing Tunis in 1985) as your pics show . and give the Luftwaffe would have been concerned with the Inner German Border area in the 80s, at most you only need the belly tanks. definately not the wing tanks. even with TERs, 6 bombs vs the displayed 4 putting a designator on center pylon is pretty smart tho. self designating, unlik alot of NATO in the 80s just a couple pennies from me. feel free to use or toss as always
  9. "NATO one niner, we wish to report a violation of UNSCR 7-8-1..." Strap in sirs. Youre about to see how the C-130s land here....
  10. wont insurance help cover a chunk of teh replacement? i know storage facilities in NC require you to have some kind of renters insurance on teh unit, either your own or one they provided at extra cost i wish you luck on recovering the old one, but realistically its more likely getting replaced than recovered edit after reading more: take a look at xidax. i've gotten 4 systems from them now since 2015 (2 laptop, 2 desktop). all but teh very oldest laptop are frankly still beasts even in 2026. hell, my new desktop from last year is more powerful than the systems in teh game development lab at my school. a fact i overlooked making a tank sim level last year (consistently made iterations at home that crashed at school )
  11. not dead. just pining for the fjords
  12. for parking, alot of pics show the bottom speed brake dropped down when parked. admittedly, was looking as the chute thru the top speed brake didnt look right. i recall reading that only the sides deployed when the landing gear was down. but i wouldnt trust that memory (its not a recent one) and most landing pics actually dont show the speed brakes being used
  13. ok, at its heart SF2 is still a Vietnam based game why else would we be keeping track of sandbags hit?
  14. checkin some stuff out
  15. i would say cant let the Yank teen jets have all teh fun but that was before i went up against the Red Baron's bloody grandson.....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..