Jump to content

Flanker562

+MODERATOR
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,041

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Flanker562

  1. Flanker562
    Ahh okay, it's been a long time since I flew the MQ-10
  2. Flanker562
    That's pretty cool how the cockpit is done.
  3. Flanker562
    I don't think it's doable as the game works by years and not by a specific date range (what you're trying to do). So basically what you're trying to do can't happen. You could use the Editor that gives you the ability to change the date but it won't modify the whole mod. That's the only workaround to get what you need.
  4. Flanker562
    Lol why not?
  5. Flanker562
    Lol at least it'll be able to be destroyed quickly
  6. Flanker562
    It would be a good stationary target for maps and the like
  7. Flanker562
    No they never had machineguns. I mean we had personal weapons but never mounted as it was strictly for TOCs and the like, strictly rear- echelon command vehicle not destined for combat
  8. Flanker562
    Yeah it would as the vehicle museum is pretty cool
  9. Flanker562
    Hmm no I want to say a Type 63 or 93 as the APC wasn't the one you dug up. Too bad I can't go back to Fort Irwin and take a photo for you ( too far and not in the Army anymore).
  10. Flanker562
    I want to say I saw an armed APC at Fort Irwin but that was a foreign (I think Chinese) ambulance that was armed. Unfortunately I don't have any photos and recalling from memory. And I used to drive a M1068 for awhile when I was at Fort Hood back in the day.
  11. Flanker562
    Ambulances aren't armed
  12. Flanker562
    Looks good GKABS
  13. Flanker562
    Lol I'd be into him as well But yeah the ACUs stick out as well
  14. Flanker562
    It does actually...
  15. Flanker562
    Now that's an out of reg mustache lol. Looking cool though...
  16. Flanker562
    It does have a unique look, though personally wouldn't call it steampunk, more of a retro look.
  17. Flanker562
    That will obviously be good for SF2V and the like
  18. Flanker562
    Yeah I did but I will fix that next update I think, maybe
  19. Flanker562
    Thanks so on the Super Hornets then I won't make it mandatory given the multi-role nature.
  20. Flanker562
    I don't know as I never tried it.
  21. Flanker562
    By default its not implemented, it uses the Avionics70.dll so you can engage one target at a time. If you change the dll to AvionicsF14A.dll you can engage multiple targets at one time. All you need to do is change the line in the main ini, such as the FA-18A.ini, and so on.
  22. Flanker562
    The Super Hornets came out before SF2:NA so aren't setup for it. And isn't in the works to be implemented as Brain32 hasn't responded to my PM yet regarding Block III cockpits and such. Also if it has to be the dll only then it probably won't be implemented due to what people have, I.e. I really don't want it to be NA specific. If it can be implemented without completely requiring NA then no problem (it functions normally but if NA is installed it shows the numbers for multiple missiles at one time)
  23. Flanker562
    Cool
  24. Flanker562
    I hear you, but 90Gb isn't that bad really but so far I've been able to score 2TB HDD for 60 bucks, so it's not great but it's good enough.
  25. Flanker562
    Years ago I made a "calliope" based off a book I liked. It was eight guns and I put the gun velocity quite high. It was just like this almost, a terror to jets and the like
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..