Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing most liked content on 07/30/2023 in Posts
-
8 pointsSome external parts updated, Rebuilt an EOTS with translucent windows and highly reflective specular textures.
-
8 points
-
7 points
-
6 points
-
5 pointsAnd now, it's the time to flight with the Mirage F1EH late version, available soon. And of course, the preview
-
5 points
-
4 points
-
4 points
-
4 points[Edited] We need to add a "self-illumination" texture to the Material interface, successfully
-
4 points
-
3 points
-
3 points
-
3 pointsSorry did not know that i just made this skin for the Skyflash 3000 , you can have it with or with out the fins , just have to make the weapons folders for it
-
3 pointsYou mean there was an expiration date on the contest!!!???!!! DAMMIT!!!!!
-
3 pointsyoure just abit behind the times ya know
-
3 pointsok time to stop screwin round and get back to skinnin just had to figure out where to go next. so i'll go back to me roots. i mean a dozen units at 8-10 airframes each should be Easy Money right? well, at least until i get into my whole 80s then early 90s then late 90s thing.....
-
3 points
-
2 pointsBut I'm having issues building the slimer lights, they don't actually glow in the game as I expect (Or just not bright enough? I don't know, because it's not as bright as other mods in nighttime environment, it looks like it doesn't glow at all,from the pictures below it can be seen that the slimer on the vertical tail does not shine at all) About my settings [RightVertailSlimer1] SystemType=LIGHT LightNodeName=Slimer_RVT1_On CanFlash=FALSE Brightness=0.04 ←← LightSrcRange=0.002 ←← I tried to add this, but it didn't work too (Of course, I refer to the data of other mods, they haven't added it, I just tried it) And I think it's probably for the same reason: MFD images seem to get very dark in shadows, but RWR and radar images can stay bright regardless of lighting, I guess this may be related to the setting of the layer channel, but I don't know where to start Can someone give me some hints? ========================================================================================================================================================================
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 pointsSome more pics Basically, it is still in the design of interactive logic and screens. After the basic interface is designed, it needs to be polished to ensure that it appears in front of everyone's eyes with the highest possible quality.
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 pointsWith the help of logan4 the main body of this cockpit may not have a big problem. I will keep his suggestions for future reference. Now I will start to completely design the MFD graphics in the cockpit
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointIf you need to change any mesh names etc inside a lod for any reason to "correct" issues which have been around since the original author made the model, whether you like it or not is hacking the lod. If you or anybody else needs to do this for their own use is fine by me but if you're the type that wants to do this just to re-upload it and say "hey look what I've done, I'm so clever" well in my book its a pirated lod. The amount of time spent pissing about with this sort of stuff would be better spent learning how to actually make models.......it's fun (sometimes) and very satisfying to produce something with your own hands.......it may not be perfect but neither is the lod you're trying to hack.
-
1 pointcollision points destroy aircraft when it meet another aircraft in the air, hitbox catch the missile. if missile do not meet hitbox it will not ruine the part of aircraft which is connected to it. Turn off hitboxes and your aircraft will be unvulnerable. Turn off colision piints and your aircraft will run through another aircraft like a ghost
-
1 pointSome more WIP thing I want to ask everyone's opinion, J-20 is a Chinese bird, so I incorporated a lot of Chinese pictographs into the cockpit design, which is obviously not the English that everyone is familiar with, is it okay for everyone?
-
1 pointAfter having won the competition for a light attack plane, FIAT had encountered problems with the structural integrity of its two-part fuselage system in the G-91. The first model, built the way it was meant to, in the wind-channel showed the possibility of unusual wear in the connection system of the two fuselage parts, which could have lead to the breaking and the loss of the plane in medium to high-g exposures. The construction team had to overthink a possibility for a workaround without making the airplane much heavier, more expensive and more difficult to maintain. Italian minister of defense, Paolo Emilio Taviani, not happy about this matter, sought an other way to reinforce the italian air force with a suitable and comparable aircraft until the problems of the G-91 would have been solved. He was then offered the A-4 Skyhawk, which was also a light and easy to maintain aircraft. Three italian pilots of the Aeronautica Militare received the possibility to test the aircraft in the US. Their reports included a satisfactory review of this nimble aircraft. It was described as nice to fly and easy to maintain. The ministry of defense, not willing to upset FIAT but showing impatience, ordered 72 A4D-2N (renamed A-4C; with an option for eventually more), which got allocated to squadrons of the 6th, 32nd and 51st Stormo in 1962. An A-4C of the 32nd Stormo, 1962 At the end of the 1960s, the A-4Cs got replaced by the more modern A-4Es, with better engine and radar and also the possibility to take more payload on board. Some of the A-4C, which some of the italian pilots called "topolino" (little mouse), got retained for training purposes while most of the fleet got back to the US or sold to other countries. A-4Es from the 51st Stormo, 1970 At the end of the 1960s, FIAT finally was able to start delivering G-91 to the air forces. Italy, though being local customer, was doubtful about replacing the Skyhawks with the Ginas, since all pilots were satisfied with the capabilities and the flight characteristics of the aircraft. Mario Tanassi, then minister of defense, declared, after having discussed this matter with the Adreotti administration, that the Skyhawks would be replaced by G-91 in a matter of two years with the exception of the 6th Stormo. The replaced Skyhawks got then sold to other countries or scrapped for spare parts. The 6th Stormo was the last wing having the Skyhawk, receiving in 1973 the last upgrade with the A-4F. A-4Fs of the 6th Stormo The wing did not have the Skyhawk for a long time. In 1978, MoD Attilio Ruffini on behalf of the italian government, got into negotiations with SecDef Harold Brown of the Carter Administration about the purchase of 24 A-6 and 4 EA-6 aircraft of Grumman for replacing the Skyhawks. In Spring 1979, the negotiations were successful and Italy was to receive the new aircraft in early 1980. The days of the Skyhawk in italian service got fewer and fewer. The last Skyhawk was taken out of commission and sold to Brazil in April 1980. A-6S' of the 6th Stormo, around Summer 1980 EA-6S', Summer 1980
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointQutar Typhoon coming soon with refueling poem. Texture/screenshots by compufat.
-
1 pointI have to say that the F-35C is growing on me a little bit. It still needs a lot of work (hopefully simonmiller416's version is better) but for now it will replace the F-16. I mean the F-16 is okay, but it just has so little fuel and well, doesn't land on carriers, which is probably why it doesn't appeal to me.
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point75th Anniversary, 20 years in service. 23°Gruppo F-104S-ASA MM6737
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 pointRAF Coningsby work in progress for Sundowner's awesome PR UK terrain, finally figured out the diffuse effect for the floodlights that avoids the dreaded flickering.
-
1 pointOk, here's the deal -- English is the main language used on this site. It's perfectly OK to have PART of the announcement in Spanish, the MAIN announcement MUST be in English. Also, can you PLEASE try and put your uploads in the proper place???? "What If" aircraft and skins have their own sections. Otherwise, we (moderators and admins) have to keep moving from where you put them, to where they actually go. thank you
-
1 pointMartins; No se entendió mucho lo que dijiste.Por favor,escribir en el hermoso idioma español Tomarse la molestia de traducirlo, como nosotros también lo hacemos cuando posteamos en otros subforos Muchachos, el Nesher les quedo realmente INCREÍBLE! Mis felicitaciones, una manteca
-
1 pointMuy Hermoso. Impecable Realmente. Sera que tal vez y solo tal ves , Pueda que lo subas ??...
-
1 pointOK..This is the Dev teams sim..period.I am sure they will be doing BOTH sides justice.IF you want to turn this into a polictal debate on which side did what then this topic will be HEAVILY edited to remove anything EXCEPT responses that pertain to the origional topic.FINAL WARNING to everyone...period.I don't care British or Argintine,or any other nationality for that matter.Stay on topic.May I suggest if you a question for the team ask them in a PM NOT here!
-
1 pointOn a serious note, the disparity in information on air combat kills and other stats does not at first inspire confidence in a Falklands Sim project developed outside of the UK. I hope the developer can show he is working closely with authentic British sources of information and is not involved with the propaganda that is still prevelant in the less-developed World. In case any Americans fail to understand the real potential threat to truth here, try to imagine a Vietnam Era Sim made by developers in Hanoi with a mission script by Jane Fonda! I kind of look forward to the Falklands Sim, but like many Brits, I am also cringing a little bit. There is nothing wrong with depicting all aspects of a difficult episode with mistakes and tragedy on both sides, but I don't ever want to read some of the crap I have been exposed to here in a Commercial Simulator. To the developer, please check your sources carefully and start with a free and open press along with documents and publications freely available in a true democracy. Please get it right and put my hairy arse in a Harrier every time!
-
1 pointLet me doubt you about that....a fellow brother in arm, regardless their nationality never spoke in such terms. Maybe you wanna talk to your father in law again, and listen this time....he probably will talk about us with respect, because he know about it....he in not some kid siting behind a PC, pretending he is Rambo or wherever action hero you have over there. Yeap...you are right....here you have some pictures, to backing up what i´m saying. This two A-4´s, are about to "run home to mama with your tails between ur legs" Bombs away Is she sinking????? Yeap....she´s gone. Bye Bye HMS Coventry. I have tons of this kind of "backing it up with actions". So next time, before you end up looking like an idiot, think twice ;) Rds
Important Information
By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..