Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content on 10/03/2017 in all areas

  1. 6 points
    Reverse and spoilers air brakes.
  2. 5 points
    Having fun with the Japanese Black Panthers!
  3. 3 points
    I love old magazine ads like that. Between classes at Siena college in upstate New York, too many years ago, I used to sit in the upper stacks at the college library and read bound copies of old Scientific American magazines from the World War One time period. They had an amazing collection at Siena in those days.
  4. 3 points
    yo Allen, i heard you like refuelers dawg....... so i got you a refueler refueling a refueler! (btw it is damn hard to keep formation in a jumbo!)
  5. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  6. 3 points
    Note the info. in bold in the old ad below: easy starting, smooth running, also more miles per gallon. This is with reference to the coal-tar derived product consisting of benzene and toluene, similar in chemical structure to German benzole (benzene)...apparently it "spikes" the octane rating since benzole/benzene is of high-octane content, also helps with anti-knock tendencies in an engine. Also note the spelling "benzene," not to be confused with "benzine" (light petroluem and the word for gasoline in several languages). Von S
  7. 2 points
    A fuck censor 'eh? Funny! Actually reminds me of a day last year when I was still in the Army. There were kids on a school trip visiting our hangar. We were doing a 100 hour on one of the Chinooks. Guy drops something on the aircraft. Instinctively I'm about to ask "What the fuck was that?" but the kids were in my peripheral and I ended up asking "What the fffffruitsnacks was that?" EDIT: Or not. Appears the fuck censor is gone. Well, story is staying up!
  8. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  9. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  10. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  11. 1 point
    This is one of the latest and recently released books in Osprey Publishing’s “Duel” series focusing primarily on two of the major aircraft types in the South Atlantic conflict of 1982. There is already quite a lot of very good information written by the people who were there on this subject, however what I really like about the Osprey series is they are short & very concise and this book brings a lot of previous information together in one place, as well as telling us a few new things. The two main authors are: Doug Dildy – A retired USAF colonel and former F-15 pilot who worked with SHARs operationally and in air-to-air training during his first NATO tour of duty. Dildy lives in Albuquerque, NM. Pablo Calcaterra - A Canadian citizen from Argentina. He is an avid and award winning aircraft modeller, with direct access to the Argentine Air Force archives and contact with many veterans of the conflict. Calcaterra lives in London, Ontario. Other notable contributions to the book include from the Argentine FAA: Brigadier Mayor Guillermo Donadille, Brigadiers Gustavo Piuma Justo, Carlos Perona, and Comodoros Raúl Díaz, Jorge Senn and Luis Puga. And from the British FAA SHAR Pilots: Cdr Nigel ‘Sharkey’ Ward, Lt Cdrs Mike ‘Soapy’ Watson and David Smith. The book covers in more detail: · The design and development of the Sea Harrier, Mirage IIIEA and the Dagger (Mirage V); · The exact weapons that were used by both in the conflict; · Looks at pilot training and some tactics from both sides; · A look at the overall Strategic situation of the conflict. The main section “Combat” looks at the engagements from both points of view but also includes the other aircraft and ships involved giving a good overview of the conflict. Lastly statistics and analysis of the conflict are looked at with some of the major points highlighted. We get a fairly balanced book from many view points, which is essential because looking at something from only a single point of view can never show us the big picture. Overall one of my favourites so far and recommended to anyone who wants a good overview of the sometimes-ferocious air war in the South Atlantic, because make no mistake, despite the short period the loss of life was sometimes horrific and I hope this only sheds more light on their bravery and sacrifice.
  12. 1 point
    Hi Heck, yes I remember reading that too - that over-compressed engines would overheat and cause cylinder damage, also damage of other components, if run at full throttle below about 1000m alt. It also depends on the fuel type used (as extensively debated over on TheAerodrome...I printed out that whole debate...makes for a nice, small book ). Fuel was low octane in WWI (octane ratings weren't even applied until after the mid-1920s I think)...ranging anywhere from about 50 octane to 70-72 octane for the "cleaner" stuff that was hard to come by, particularly for the Germans after supplies began to run short in 1918. Such fuel burns differently than high-octane stuff and would increase the temp. dangerously on over-compressed engines, at full throttle, below recommended alt. This is likely what the Entente found when testing such engines - since the Entente was using fairly low-compression, low-octane fuel. The Germans added benzole (synthetic additive, not benzine although they sound similar) to their fuels from about late 1917/ early '18, improving hp output of over-compression engines, and possibly not overheating as much if max. throttle had to be used below recommended alt. in emergency settings - although sources vary on this. Using high-octane, modern airplane fuel in such an engine might give different results, or the engine would just cut out if recommended throttle settings at low alt. were bypassed. Can't remember reading when 100-150 octane fuel became available, probably during WWII, although aero-engine technology by then was different and would utilize high-octane stuff efficiently. I'm theorizing here but it's possible that the best fuel for over-compressed WWI engines is what the Germans were using, fairly low-octane ("low burning") stuff with a synthetic additive thrown in to improve hp output, probably better than clean fuel with no additives for that kind of engine. The low-compression engines worked perfectly fine on the low-octane fuel, on the other hand. The Germans also had summer and winter mixtures of benzole/fuel, with more benzole thrown in for winter use, something like 60/40 for winter, and 30/70 or 40/60 for summer (less benzole in the summer I think). Von S
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
    Fox on the Trot Fated Engagement The MiGs from Falkenberg High Speed Gun Solution Indomitable Eagle
  15. 1 point
    A screenshot from 10 years ago.......
  16. 1 point
  17. 1 point
  18. 1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. 1 point
    In coming!.........................soon.
  21. 1 point
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    Something's not quite right there....
  24. 1 point
    no son tantos en realidad


×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..