Leaderboard

WIP report. The Kuz sinking after bomb hits. Kashtan flak systems are firing with guns. Kashtan is firing with gun while VLS launcher is firing a SA-9-N missile.

Clearly the F-14D Super Tomcat is missed by some around here...

He's incapable of seeing allies and foes only people who can do or won't do something for him. No matter which camp those people fit into he'll use them like a tissue and throw them away when he's done. To his detriment he's single dimensional, transactional, and self aggrandizing. The US, it's citizens, and it's laws are beneath him. NATO member countries don't stand a chance. To him our ally's countries are below the dirt he walks on, non-white, anti-christian, shit holes, but he's sure some are very fine nations. (attempt at humor) For the record most of us are completely embarrassed by his behavior regardless of political alignment.

Behind Enemy Lines (2001) - With thanks to EricJ for the skin.

Canadian Carrier Ops on the North Atlantic...........

Banana Split

Thank you for your comments and feedback gentlemen, and I shall make another one that will look more realistic.

A few more tweaks and then maybe one more biplane for the 1937 - 1941 FM package...perhaps Stephen's Polikarpov I-15. Included MaxG limits for the Mk.1 Gladiator and did a quick Chinese skin too (thank you Paint3D ) - should work well now for mto and pto installs in SF2. Happy flying, Von S

Working the nightshift over the North Cape...

SAS insertion on a training mission in the UK..

Did somebody mention SF2 Civil?

Vigilante getting the pics, but watch out for that SAM!

Learning the F-4J at least BVR-wise.

https://combatace.com/forums/topic/93001-stop-the-game-from-overwriting-files/

SAC Twilight....Having some SAC-Styled fun!!!! Look Ma...no nukes!!!! Time to go...........

We'll never get the truth, only lies. He hears all kinds of things from people in his party, advisers, etc and he picks one he thinks will give him the best outcome to make himself look good. You can hear it in everything he says ... I did this ... I did that ... I'm the only one who can fix it (the shit he broke to begin with) .. I'm the chosen one. It's all about him not what's best for America, our troops, or heaven forbid the tax payers who pay the damned bill.

... here's the problem with it all. We're not leaving Syria. The small elite force isn't leaving, they aren't going to Iraq because they aren't welcome, so what are we doing? We're staying to protect the oil. We blew up our ordinances, left hardened bases standing, allowed the Turks to kill the Kurds, gave up our ground to the Russians and Turks all under the guise that we're coming home but we're staying. How does any of this make sense to anyone? Private bone spurs couldn't win at a game of "Battleship" against a 2 year old. Absolutely unbelievable.

The community doesn't want the bickering and phallus measuring, read their posts! I happen to agree. Stop bringing this crap to my table, it's insulting and very childish. You wouldn't allow this at your dinner table with your family sitting around so why should I allow it here? I enjoy you both and reading what you have to offer but if I have to make a decision between each of you, EAW with it's variations, or this community as a whole; that won't be a hard decision to make. I've hidden all the posts that don't relate to Jel's original post. I'll leave this in Stratus' capable hands and will await his final decision which I'll act on and support without question. Final warning gentlemen. Get it together. Thank you.

for a game, looks nice. IRL it would not be so big and scattered, more of a collapsed in on itself and any pieces that fly will be smaller and flatter. i dont mean to discourage, just observation of how damage buildings look. they actually stay together fairly well, i recall an apartment building in Kosovo that had one side missing like a dollhouse but otherwise was in use (including residents watching SKY News on satellite TV). perhaps if you are able to bring the pieces together back to the main building, to give that part crumpled and burnt look esp go for burnt, its what actually kills buildings and ships (if you cant cause complete instant structural failure)

when you tryin to be civil, but that DoD money is looking mighty good

Pretty sure this is covered in our ever ignored Knowledge Base (tm) AI planes made user flyable will always be rewritten back to AI-only as a matter of course when the game starts. You just simply have to make the main ini (ie: MiG-21MF.ini) read only. Of course, that is after adding all the cockpit bits and listing the inis..OTH, you won't be able to add any further skins to it, as it can't write to a read only (duh!)

Very pretty trucks !!! Top !

Looks like the terminal has been made of granite, good work!

This is will be the destroyed model for the terminal. I hope you will like it. More work need to be done to the texture mapping

I saw this fitting camo pattern and just couldn't resist...

Yawn ya just need to rebuild the VietnamSEA map, making everything friendly (cities) then add "hidden" Viet Minh camps in the jungle.

Nice one! I'm really looking forward to that (and maybe new models of some other variants aswell). I once started a TA-4F in blender, but since I lack the skills, I could not proceed very well. If you're interested I can send, what I have...maybe it can save you some time.

Might need to re-work the MiG21 aluminum next. This guy needed a polishing after this.

waiting to align the astro inertial nav system.......

Mr. Jelly has never taken credit for EAWPRO. Adding it as an option under the 1.6 umbrella is a perfectly reasonable thing to do and he's always made it clear that it is VBH's work. Credit HAS been given and that's as much as any of us modders can ask. You see, our work is non-proprietary, meaning that once it's out there anyone can do whatever they want with it. It doesn't matter if VBH doesn't like what Mr. Jelly is doing. The simple fact it he can't do anything about it. Of course, in a normal environment a modder would be THRILLED to have his work enjoyed by as many members as possible and so would encourage the actions of someone willing to put in the effort to incorporate their product for greater exposure. I'll give you an example of how it would work if we had a normal environment in these forums. Back in 2007 not long after the original SPAW was released by The ModSquad, I downloaded a copy from Talley-ho just see see if there were any installation problems. Everything looked OK at first and then I noticed that one of the carrier groups had been moved. When I inquired at our back forum as too the reason, it turned out that none of the groups in the ModSquad's version were close enough for online play. Seems there is no time compression in online play so the opposing forces need to be fairly close so Mr. Jelly moved the group to a better location for online play. That was fine, however, the carrier group was placed about a mile from an island AND heading right toward it. Now consider that we had toiled for a year on this project, striving for accuracy and as much realism as we could pack into the game, you can imagine we weren't too happy with this turn of events and we pitched a fit in the forum. Let me say that technically, Mr. Jelly was within his rights to do what he wanted. However, IN THE SPIRIT OF COOPERATION he offered two different versions, one for offline and one for online play. Got that? IN THE SPIRIT OF COOPERATION.

My comment above was intended to propose a fair and just method of asking for "use" permission and for describing how attribution to other Modders, for use of their product, ought to be done in a fair and reasonable way. I look forward to seeing ALL the Modders re-vamping their sites/files/comments in order to give prominent credit to those former Modders on whose shoulders current Modders stand. Again, this is a fair and just proposition, I think. Simply give credit where credit is due.

I am distressed to see such rancor amongst very valuable contributors to the EAW sim. I find value in all versions of the game, and I wish all Modders well in their separate undertakings. That said, I think it only proper that one Modder not "borrow" the work of another Modder without the explicit agreement of the "borrowed-from" Modder, and full and very prominent attribution being given in such every such instance. Absent such explicit agreement, then no "borrowing" ought to take place. I'm sure all fair-minded people would agree with this proposition. If there are those that disagree--in that "Borrowing" from another Modder without his/her explicit consent is proper behavior-- then let them explain their rationale for doing such unauthorized "borrowing".

Like a Timex......takes a whole pile of 50 cal and still landed in mostly one piece...out of gas.

Still Tuesday in the partition line I think... Returning aboard after a succesful strike on Damascus, 1983.

Working on another Hornet skin, this time a VFA-37 CAG bird in 2008:

Opening salvoes of Operation Enduring Freedom

y estos son mis modelos en los que estoy trabajando en mayor o menor estado de alistamiento pero ya funcionando en el simulador

Battle of Britain......Poles do what they want...